Next steps: RPA calculations (standalone)

Optical absorption in hBN: independent particle approximation

Background

The dielectric function in the long-wavelength limit, at the independent particle level (RPA without local fields), is essentially given by the following:

In practice, Yambo does not use this expression directly but solves the Dyson equation for the susceptibility X, which is described in the Local fields module.

Choosing input parameters

Enter the folder for bulk hBN that contains the SAVE directory, run the initialization and generate the input file. From yambo -h you should understand that the correct option is yambo -optics c (or yambo -o c). Let's add some command line options:

$ cd YAMBO_TUTORIALS/hBN/YAMBO
$ yambo               (initialization)
$ yambo -F yambo.in_IP -o c

This corresponds to optical properties in G-space at the independent particle level: in the input file this is indicated by (Chimod= "IP").

Optics runlevel

For optical properties we are interested just in the long-wavelength limit q = 0. This always corresponds to the first q-point in the set of possible q=k-k' -points. Change the following variables in the input file to:

% QpntsRXd
 1 |  1 |                   # [Xd] Transferred momenta
%
ETStpsXd= 1001               # [Xd] Total Energy steps

in order to select just the first q. The last variable ensures we generate a smooth spectrum. Save the input file and launch the code, keeping the command line options as before (i.e., just remove the lower case options):

$ yambo -F yambo.in_IP -J Full
...
<---> [05] Optics
<---> [LA] SERIAL linear algebra
<---> [DIP] Checking dipoles header
<---> [x,Vnl] computed using 4 projectors
<---> [M  0.017 Gb] Alloc WF ( 0.016)
<---> [WF] Performing Wave-Functions I/O from ./SAVE
<01s> Dipoles: P and iR (T): |########################################| [100%] 01s(E) 01s(X)
<01s> [M  0.001 Gb] Free WF ( 0.016)
<01s> [DIP] Writing dipoles header
<01s> [X-CG] R(p) Tot o/o(of R)  :   5501   52992     100
<01s> Xo@q[1] |########################################| [100%] --(E) --(X)
<01s> [06] Game Over & Game summary
 
$ ls
Full   SAVE  yambo.in_IP   r_setup
o-Full.eel_q1_ip  o-Full.eps_q1_ip  r-Full_optics_chi

Let's take a moment to understand what Yambo has done inside the Optics runlevel:

1. Compute the [x,Vnl] term
2. Read the wavefunctions from disc [WF]
3. Compute the dipoles, i.e. matrix elements of p
4. Write the dipoles to disk as Full/ndb.dip* databases. This you can see in the report file:

$ grep -A20 "WR" r-Full_optics_chi 
[WR./Full//ndb.dip_iR_and_P]
Brillouin Zone Q/K grids (IBZ/BZ):  14   72   14   72
RL vectors                   (WF): 1491
Electronic Temperature        [K]: 0.0000000
Bosonic    Temperature        [K]: 0.0000000
X band range           :   1  100
RL vectors in the sum  : 1491
[r,Vnl] included       :yes
...

5. Finally, Yambo computes the non-interacting susceptibility X₀ for this q, and writes the dielectric function inside the o-Full.eps_q1_ip file for plotting

Energy cut off

Before plotting the output, let's change a few more variables. The previous calculation used all the G-vectors in expanding the wavefunctions, up to 1491 (~1016 components). This corresponds roughly to the cut off energy of 40Ry we used in the DFT calculation. Generally, however, we can use a smaller value. We use the verbosity to switch on this variable, and a new -J flag to avoid reading the previous database:

$ yambo -F yambo.in_IP -J 6Ry -V RL -o c

Change the value of FFTGvecs and also its unit from RL (number of G-vectors) to Ry (energy in Rydberg):

FFTGvecs= 6           Ry    # [FFT] Plane-waves

Save the input file and launch the code again:

 $ yambo -F yambo.in_IP -J 6Ry 

and then plot the o-Full.eps_q1_ip and o-6Ry.eps_q1_ip files:

$ gnuplot
gnuplot> plot "o-Full.eps_q1_ip" w l,"o-6Ry.eps_q1_ip" w p

Clearly there is very little difference between the two spectra. This highlights an important point in calculating excited state properties: generally, fewer G-vectors are needed than what are needed in DFT calculations. Regarding the spectrum itself, the first peak occurs at about 4.4eV. This is consistent with the minimum direct gap reported by Yambo: 4.28eV. The comparison with experiment (not shown) is very poor however.

If you make some mistake, and cannot reproduce this figure, you should check the value of FFTGvecs in the input file, delete the 6Ry folder, and try again - taking care to plot the right file! (e.g. o-6Ry.eps_q1_ip_01).

q-direction

Now let's select a different component of the dielectric tensor:

$ yambo -F yambo.in_IP -J 6Ry -V RL -o c
...
% LongDrXd
0.000000 | 0.000000 | 1.000000 |        # [Xd] [cc] Electric Field
%
...
$ yambo -F yambo.in_IP -J 6Ry

This time yambo reads from the 6Ry folder, so it does not need to compute the dipole matrix elements again, and the calculation is fast. Plotting gives:

$ gnuplot
gnuplot> plot "o-6Ry.eps_q1_ip" t "q || x-axis" w l,"o-6Ry.eps_q1_ip_01" t "q || c-axis" w l

The absorption is suppressed in the stacking direction. As the interplanar spacing is increased, we would eventually arrive at the absorption of the BN sheet (see Local fields tutorial).

Non-local commutator

Last, we show the effect of switching off the non-local commutator term (see [Vnl,r] in the equation at the top of the page) due to the pseudopotential. As there is no option to do this inside yambo, you need to hide the database file. Change back to the q || (1 0 0) direction, and launch yambo with a different -J option:

$ mv SAVE/ns.kb_pp_pwscf SAVE/ns.kb_pp_pwscf_OFF
$ yambo -F yambo.in_IP -J 6Ry_NoVnl -o c             (change to q || 100)
$ yambo -F yambo.in_IP -J 6Ry_NoVnl

Note the warning in the output:

<---> [WARNING] Missing non-local pseudopotential contribution

which also appears in the report file, and noted in the database as [r,Vnl] included :no. The difference is tiny:

However, when your system is larger, with more projectors in the pseudopotential or more k-points (see the BSE tutorial), the inclusion of Vnl can make a huge difference in the computational load, so it's always worth checking to see if the terms are important in your system.

Optical absorption in 2D BN: local field effects

Background

Cheatsheet on LFE

The macroscopic dielectric function is obtained by including the so-called local field effects (LFE) in the calculation of the response function. Within the time-dependent DFT formalism this is achieved by solving the Dyson equation for the susceptibility X. In reciprocal space this is given by:

The microscopic dielectric function is related to X by:

and the macroscopic dielectric function is obtained by taking the (0,0) component of the inverse microscopic one:

Experimental observables like the optical absorption and the electron energy loss can be obtained from the macroscopic dielectric function:

In the following we will neglect the f ^xc term: we perform the calculation at the RPA level and consider just the Hartree term (from v_G) in the kernel. If we also neglect the Hartree term, we arrive back at the independent particle approximation, since there is no kernel and X = X₀.

Choosing input parameters

Enter the folder for 2D hBN that contains the SAVE directory, and generate the input file. From yambo -H you should understand that the correct option is yambo -o c -k hartree. Let's start by running the calculation for light polarization q in the plane of the BN sheet:

$ cd YAMBO_TUTORIALS/hBN-2D/YAMBO
$ yambo        (Initialization)
$ yambo -F yambo.in_RPA -V RL -J q100 -o c -k hartree

We thus use a new input file yambo.in_RPA, switch on the FFTGvecs variable, and label all outputs/databases with a q100 tag. Make sure to set/modify all of the following variables to:

FFTGvecs=     6        Ry    # [FFT] Plane-waves
Chimod= "Hartree"            # [X] IP/Hartree/ALDA/LRC/BSfxc
NGsBlkXd=     3        Ry    # [Xd] Response block size
% QpntsRXd
 1 |  1 |                   # [Xd] Transferred momenta
%
% EnRngeXd
 0.00000 | 20.00000 | eV    # [Xd] Energy range
%
% DmRngeXd
0.200000 | 0.200000 | eV    # [Xd] Damping range
%
ETStpsXd= 2001               # [Xd] Total Energy steps
% LongDrXd
1.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |        # [Xd] [cc] Electric Field
%

In this input file, we have:

• We evaluate the q-->0 response function choosing the direction for the limit parallel in the plane of the hBN sheet
• A wider energy range than before, and more broadening
• Selected the Hartree kernel, and expanded G-vectors in the screening up to 3 Ry (about 85 G-vectors)

LFEs in periodic direction

Now let's run the code with this new input file (CECAM in serial: about 2mins; parallel 4 tasks: 50s)

$ yambo -F yambo.in_RPA  -J q100 

and let's compare the absorption with and without the local fields included. By inspecting the o-q100.eps_q1_inv_rpa_dyson file we find that this information is given in the 2nd and 4th columns, respectively:

$ head -n30 o-q100.eps_q1_inv_rpa_dyson
# Absorption @ Q(1) [q->0 direction] : 1.0000000  0.0000000  0.0000000
#  E/ev[1]     EPS-Im[2]   EPS-Re[3]   EPSo-Im[4]  EPSo-Re[5]

Plot the result:

$ gnuplot

gnuplot> plot "o-q100.eps_q1_inv_rpa_dyson" u 1:2 w l t "RPA-LFA","o-q100.eps_q1_inv_rpa_dyson" u 1:4 w l t "noLFE", "o-q100.eel_q1_inv_rpa_dyson" u 1:4 w l ls 7 dt 2 t "EELS"

It is clear that there is little influence of local fields in this case. This is generally the case for semiconductors or materials with a smoothly varying electronic density. We have also shown the EELS spectrum (o-q100.eel_q1_inv_rpa_dyson) for comparison.

LFEs in non-periodic direction

Now let's switch to q perpendicular to the BN plane:

$ yambo -F yambo.in_RPA -V RL -o c -k hartree        and set
...
% LongDrXd
0.000000 | 0.000000 | 1.000000 |        # [Xd] [cc] Electric Field
%

You can try out the default parallel usage now, or run again in serial, i.e.

$ yambo -F yambo.in_RPA  -J q001       (serial)
$ mpirun -np 4 yambo -F yambo.in_RPA  -J q001 &      (parallel, MPI only, 4 tasks)

As noted previously, the log files in parallel appear in the LOG folder, you can follow the execution with tail -F LOG/l-q001_optics_chi_CPU_1 .

Plotting the output file:

$ gnuplot
gnuplot> plot "o-q001.eps_q1_inv_rpa_dyson" u 1:2 w l,"o-q001.eps_q1_inv_rpa_dyson" u 1:4 w l

In this case, the absorption is strongly blueshifted with respect to the in-plane absorption. Furthermore, the influence of local fields is striking, and quenches the spectrum strongly. This is the well known depolarization effect. Local field effects are much stronger in the perpendicular direction because the charge inhomogeneity is dramatic. Many G-vectors are needed to account for the sharp change in the potential across the BN-vacuum interface.

Absorption versus EELS

In order to understand this further, we plot the electron energy loss spectrum for this component and compare with the absorption:

$ gnuplot
gnuplot > plot "o-q001.eps_q1_inv_rpa_dyson" w l,"o-q001.eel_q1_inv_rpa_dyson" w l

The conclusion is that the absorption and EELS coincide for isolated systems. To understand why this is, you need to consider the role of the macroscopic screening in the response function and the long-range part of the Coulomb potential. See e.g.

Prev: CECAM School Home --> First steps

Now: CECAM School Home --> Next steps

Back to: CECAM School Home