Coulomb Cutoff

Run-time issues concerning Yambo that are not covered in the above forums.

Moderators: myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano, Conor Hogan

Post Reply
martinspenke
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:05 am

Coulomb Cutoff

Post by martinspenke » Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:36 pm

Dear Daniele,

Two questions concerning Coulomb Cut-off :
1) Should one use Coulomb Cut-off technique both in GW AND BSE calculation
or is it enough having used it once in GW calculation for converging quasi particle energies ?
2) Is it generally better to use a box or sphere (because of its analytical nature) for isolated molecules ?

Regards
Martin
Martin Spenke, PhD Student
Theoretisch-Physikalisches Institut
Universität Hamburg, Germany

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Coulomb Cutoff

Post by Daniele Varsano » Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:54 pm

Dear Martin,
it is important to cut the interaction in the screening, so it is useful to introduce it also in the BSE, even if the bigger effect are in the GW calculations as you can see in PHYSICAL REVIEW B 73, 205119 2006. Anyway, you need to calculate it once for all at the beginning, next the code will read the database, provided it is indicated in the input with the same geometry.
If your geometry is permits it I suggest you to use the sphere, being analytical as you said, it is more accurate. In the case you need to use the box, please be aware to set the edge of the box in input the double on what you need (this is related to an internal function of the code still needed to be fixed). This is reported in several post in the forum.

Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply