cutgeo for 1D periodic system

Concerns issues with computing quasiparticle corrections to the DFT eigenvalues - i.e., the self-energy within the GW approximation (-g n), or considering the Hartree-Fock exchange only (-x)

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
sunxl
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2024 8:05 am
Location: China

cutgeo for 1D periodic system

Post by sunxl » Sat Mar 07, 2026 8:01 am

Dear all,

I am calculating the GW and BSE for a one-dimensional helical chain with the z-axis as the periodic direction. How should I set up CUTGeo? Should it be set as slab XY or ws Z? May I ask what ws Z setting represents? Are there any differences between these two?

Best,
sunxl
Dr. sunxl
Beijing Computing Science Research Center, China.

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4331
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: cutgeo for 1D periodic system

Post by Daniele Varsano » Mon Mar 09, 2026 4:26 pm

Dear Sunxl,

for 1D system periodic along z you have three options:
1) Box XY setting the cutoff size on the non-periodic directions (set it slightly smaller than your cell size)
2) Cylinder Z setting the cylinder radius
3) ws Z (wigner seitz cut), need to set an energy cutoff on the coulomb component to be corrected (default 0.7 a.u)

I discourage the use the cylinder as it can be unstable. My suggestion is to use "WS Z" but this is viable only if your cell is orthorhombic. Please note that for this option convergence should be checked against k point sampling, but being 1D usually one can afford a large sampling.

Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

sunxl
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2024 8:05 am
Location: China

Re: cutgeo for 1D periodic system

Post by sunxl » Thu Mar 26, 2026 8:11 am

Dear Daniele,
Thank you for your reply.

For the first case, if I set box XY, I need to specify the size of the box in the x and y directions respectively. If my crystal lattice is hexagonal and the angle between ab is 120°, where a is parallel to x, and assuming that my a and b are both 30 au, then

1. Is it appropriate to set the box in the x direction to 29 or 28?
2. Since y and b are not in the same direction, how should I set the size in the y direction to be appropriate?

Best,
sunxl
Dr. sunxl
Beijing Computing Science Research Center, China.

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4331
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: cutgeo for 1D periodic system

Post by Daniele Varsano » Thu Mar 26, 2026 8:46 am

Dear sunxl,

the box cut value are appropriate, anyway as you noticed the potential cut geometry is not anymore consistent with your ab cell.
Possibly this is not a major issue if you have enough vacuum, but this should be checked. Alternatively, I suggest you resort to an orthogonal ab cell even if you would have more vacuum for the same image distance.

Best,

Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply