The output of GW
Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 12:30 pm
The output of GW
Dear all:
What are the "Eo E-Eo Sc(Eo)" in the output file of GW?
Thanks!
SDWang
What are the "Eo E-Eo Sc(Eo)" in the output file of GW?
Thanks!
SDWang
- myrta gruning
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:38 am
- Contact:
Re: The output of GW
Hallo Shudong Wangsdwang wrote:Dear all:
What are the "Eo E-Eo Sc(Eo)" in the output file of GW?
Thanks!
SDWang
Eo bare energy (coming out from the DFT calculation you input to yambo)
E-Eo difference between quasiparticle energy E and the bare energy Eo, so that is the QP correction
Sc(Eo) Value of the \Sigma_c at Eo
Regards
m
Dr Myrta Grüning
School of Mathematics and Physics
Queen's University Belfast - Northern Ireland
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-1515-2009
School of Mathematics and Physics
Queen's University Belfast - Northern Ireland
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-1515-2009
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 12:30 pm
Re: The output of GW
Thank you for your reply.
That is to say Yambo can calcualte the bare band structurres of DFT (E0)according to scf and nscf of pwscf??( my interface is pwscf)
That is to say Yambo can calcualte the bare band structurres of DFT (E0)according to scf and nscf of pwscf??( my interface is pwscf)
- Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4198
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: The output of GW
Yes, the DFT band structure is reported, you can easily check it.
Cheers,
Daniele
Cheers,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
- myrta gruning
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:38 am
- Contact:
Re: The output of GW
Hallo
Just a remark.
Yambo is not calculating the DFT band structure, is reporting the DFT energies calculated in the DFT run by (in your case) pwscf in the k mesh you have chosen and that you provide as an input.
As Daniele said, in the report file you find all DFT eigenenergies at each k-point of the mesh. These are just an input of Yambo, not an output.
Regards,
m
Just a remark.
Yambo is not calculating the DFT band structure, is reporting the DFT energies calculated in the DFT run by (in your case) pwscf in the k mesh you have chosen and that you provide as an input.
As Daniele said, in the report file you find all DFT eigenenergies at each k-point of the mesh. These are just an input of Yambo, not an output.
Regards,
m
Dr Myrta Grüning
School of Mathematics and Physics
Queen's University Belfast - Northern Ireland
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-1515-2009
School of Mathematics and Physics
Queen's University Belfast - Northern Ireland
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-1515-2009
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 12:30 pm
Re: The output of GW
Thank you!myrta gruning wrote:Hallo
Just a remark.
Yambo is not calculating the DFT band structure, is reporting the DFT energies calculated in the DFT run by (in your case) pwscf in the k mesh you have chosen and that you provide as an input.
As Daniele said, in the report file you find all DFT eigenenergies at each k-point of the mesh. These are just an input of Yambo, not an output.
Regards,
m
In the output of GW,there are:
[02.05] Energies [ev] & Occupations
===================================
Fermi Energy[ev] - T[ev/K] : 5.951745 0.000000 0.000000
States summary : Full Metallic Empty
0001-0004 0005-0050
Indirect Gaps [ev]: 1.117994 3.154146
Direct Gaps [ev]: 2.794973 5.387020
For " Indirect Gaps [ev]: 1.117994 3.154146", the 1.117994 is the data of DFT ,and the 3.154146 is the GW data, is it right??
S D Wang
- myrta gruning
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:38 am
- Contact:
Re: The output of GW
Hallo,[02.05] Energies [ev] & Occupations
===================================
Fermi Energy[ev] - T[ev/K] : 5.951745 0.000000 0.000000
States summary : Full Metallic Empty
0001-0004 0005-0050
Indirect Gaps [ev]: 1.117994 3.154146
Direct Gaps [ev]: 2.794973 5.387020
For " Indirect Gaps [ev]: 1.117994 3.154146", the 1.117994 is the data of DFT ,and the 3.154146 is the GW data, is it right??
No, both are DFT gaps (relative to the k-grid you have in you calculation).
Note that the report file is organized in sections and subsections.
What you reported is section 2.05
all section 2 is about:
Code: Select all
[02] Input variables setup
Code: Select all
[06] Dyson equation: Newton solver
Code: Select all
[06.02] Q(uasi)P(article) properties
Code: Select all
QP [eV] @ K [1] (iku): 0.000 0.000 0.000
B=19 Eo= -1.56 E= -3.74 E-Eo= -2.18 Z=0.86 So= 2.07418 xx=-18.57731 Vxc=-13.96801
B=20 Eo= -1.56 E= -3.76 E-Eo= -2.19 Z=0.86 So= 2.06385 xx=-18.57655 Vxc=-13.96766
B=21 Eo= -1.22 E= -3.31 E-Eo= -2.08 Z=0.86 So= 2.09297 xx=-18.70781 Vxc=-14.19493
B=22 Eo= -1.22 E= -3.07 E-Eo= -1.85 Z=0.85 So= 1.96251 xx=-17.81735 Vxc=-13.67904
B=23 Eo= 0.00 E= -1.18 E-Eo= -1.18 Z=0.86 So= 1.177 xx=-16.05 Vxc=-13.50
B=24 Eo= 0.00 E= -1.18 E-Eo= -1.18 Z=0.86 So= 1.17296 xx=-16.04541 Vxc=-13.50312
B=25 Eo= 4.39 E= 7.96 E-Eo= 3.57 Z=0.88 So= -0.63854 xx= -7.97938 Vxc=-12.69211
B=26 Eo= 4.39 E= 7.96 E-Eo= 3.57 Z=0.88 So= -0.63949 xx= -7.97820 Vxc=-12.69144
B=27 Eo= 5.02 E= 8.66 E-Eo= 3.64 Z=0.89 So= -1.14389 xx= -7.11480 Vxc=-12.33968
Note as well that the r_* are report files. The output of the calculation (when is human readable) is reported in the o.* files. In this case o.qp.
Regards,
m
Dr Myrta Grüning
School of Mathematics and Physics
Queen's University Belfast - Northern Ireland
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-1515-2009
School of Mathematics and Physics
Queen's University Belfast - Northern Ireland
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-1515-2009
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 12:30 pm
Re: The output of GW
"No, both are DFT gaps (relative to the k-grid you have in you calculation)."
What does this mean?? Why there are two different indirect band gap? I am confused. I hope you can explain it in detail.
Thanks!
What does this mean?? Why there are two different indirect band gap? I am confused. I hope you can explain it in detail.
Thanks!
- myrta gruning
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:38 am
- Contact:
Re: The output of GW
Hallo,
Maybe you are confused by the word gap, thinking just about a minimum gap.
Think about Gap as energy difference between a valence and conduction band at a certain k. Then Yambo lists the two lowest gap, both direct and indirect.
Looking in the list of DFT energies at the various k point you have below the
you should be able to find out to which transition these gaps corresponds.
m
Maybe you are confused by the word gap, thinking just about a minimum gap.
Think about Gap as energy difference between a valence and conduction band at a certain k. Then Yambo lists the two lowest gap, both direct and indirect.
Looking in the list of DFT energies at the various k point you have below the
Code: Select all
ndirect Gaps [ev]: 1.117994 3.154146
Direct Gaps [ev]: 2.794973 5.387020
m
Dr Myrta Grüning
School of Mathematics and Physics
Queen's University Belfast - Northern Ireland
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-1515-2009
School of Mathematics and Physics
Queen's University Belfast - Northern Ireland
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-1515-2009
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 12:30 pm
Re: The output of GW
Take the direct gap as a example, is the 2.794973 eV denotes the samllest direct gap ,and the 5.387020 denoyes the most wide direct gap?myrta gruning wrote:Hallo,
Maybe you are confused by the word gap, thinking just about a minimum gap.
Think about Gap as energy difference between a valence and conduction band at a certain k. Then Yambo lists the two lowest gap, both direct and indirect.
Looking in the list of DFT energies at the various k point you have below theyou should be able to find out to which transition these gaps corresponds.Code: Select all
ndirect Gaps [ev]: 1.117994 3.154146 Direct Gaps [ev]: 2.794973 5.387020
m
Last edited by sdwang on Tue May 25, 2010 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.