Dear developer,
I am trying to calculate the contribution of individual e-h pairs in the excited state. The test system is bulk hBN (as given here : http://www.yambo-code.org/wiki/index.ph ... ter_kernel). I am using more-or-less the same input files with minor changes. However, while calculating the weights with ypp, I seem to be able to access only the q=0 components. If, in the input file for ypp, I change the variable "Qpts" to any value other than "1", I get an error message saying "[ERROR] ndb.BSS_diago not found". Indeed, in the SAVE directory, all the ndb.BS files correspond to Q1. Does this mean te excitonic Hamiltonian is constructed and solved only at q=0? Please note that, in the yambo input file the value for "% QpntsRXs" is "1 | 14 |". Could you please suggest a way to get the weights at other q-points?
Best regards,
Subhayan
Weight at q-point other than gamma
Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:48 am
Weight at q-point other than gamma
Subhayan Roychoudhury
Postdoctoral researcher
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Postdoctoral researcher
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4198
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Weight at q-point other than gamma
Dear Subhayan,
finite q Bethe Salpeter equation is present yambo, but not yet released in the GPL version, hopefully it will be released soon.
You access q=0 components because you calculated excitations for q=0.
If you are interested in optics anyway, absorption spectra have to be calculated for q=0. Finite q is needed when calculating electron-energy loss spectra.
Best,
Daniele
finite q Bethe Salpeter equation is present yambo, but not yet released in the GPL version, hopefully it will be released soon.
You access q=0 components because you calculated excitations for q=0.
If you are interested in optics anyway, absorption spectra have to be calculated for q=0. Finite q is needed when calculating electron-energy loss spectra.
This is because you need the screening at all q in order to build the kernel of the excitonic Hamiltonian also at q=0, this is not the "q" of the excitation, you can realize it by looking at the expressions in the tutorial you are indicating. There cv belong to the same k (q=0) and are coupled with c'v' at another k' (q=0).Please note that in the yambo input file the value for "% QpntsRXs" is "1 | 14 |"
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:48 am
Re: Weight at q-point other than gamma
Dear Daniele,
Perfect. This answers my question.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Subhayan
Perfect. This answers my question.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Subhayan
Subhayan Roychoudhury
Postdoctoral researcher
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Postdoctoral researcher
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory