Convergence parameters for lifetimes

Concerns issues with computing quasiparticle corrections to the DFT eigenvalues - i.e., the self-energy within the GW approximation (-g n), or considering the Hartree-Fock exchange only (-x)

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
Andy
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:03 am

Convergence parameters for lifetimes

Post by Andy » Thu Jun 25, 2015 2:07 pm

Hello,
I've a question about the convergence parameters of the G0W0 lifetimes (no on-mass shell approximation).
I attached you a typical input-file.
At the moment I try to converge the following parameters to the following limits:
  • -FFTGvecs, EXXRLvcs -> "infinity"
    -NGsBlkXd -> "infinity" #number of RL for the Kernel; usually INcreases the lifetiems?
    -BndsRnXd -> "infinity" #number of bands for X; usually DEcreases the lifetiems?
    -GbndRnge -> "infinity" #number of bands für G; usually DEcreases the lifetimes?
    -GDamping -> "zero" # Gamma in W?; usually INcreases the lifetiems? I had problems when using the PPA, as decreasing GDamping perfectly scaled (linearly, decreasing GDamping by an arbitrary factor gave me the original lifetime times this factor) so that I was not able to find a converged value. Without PPA this was possible. Is this a commonly known fact that PPA is not suitable for lifetimes?
Is this list complete or do I miss important convergence parameters?

I'm a little bit confused about the influence of the following parameters:

-DmRngeXd: This parameter heavily increases the lifetimes when setting to a smaller value. Furthermore I thought that taking more bands into account will decrease the lifetimes because of additional possibilities to scatter. However, setting this parameter to 0.0001 this is not true any longer - shouldn't I touch this parameter?
-dScStep: Setting this parameter to a smaller value (i.e. 0.005) changes the lifetimes in a strange way - suddenly the lifetime of some holes is negative while I thought that only electrons will have a negative lifetime in the conduction bands? Or did I change this parameter in the wrong direction - so do I have to increase this parameter?

Thank you very much for some comments in advance and kind regards,

Andreas Lücke
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Andreas Luecke
University of Paderborn
Germany

Post Reply