electron-phonon QP database and exciton-phonon coupling

You can find here problems arising when using old releases of Yambo (< 5.0). Issues as parallelization strategy, performance issues and other technical aspects.

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano, Conor Hogan

Locked
martinspenke
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:05 am

electron-phonon QP database and exciton-phonon coupling

Post by martinspenke » Wed Dec 28, 2016 5:07 pm

Dear Alejandro,

I am trying to do electron-phonon corrections on top of previously calculated g0w0 QP energies; however
when i use GfnQPdb= "E < SAVE/db.QP" , i end up with a bad termination error.

How can i perform electron-phonon calculation on top of g0w0 QP energies, in order to be able to include electron_phonon affected g0w0 QP energies in the subsequent BSE calculations ?
(Otherwise yambo_ph calculates it on top of KS energies, and i loose electron-electron effects.)

Further question, Andrea Marini talks in his seminal PRL paper from 2008 about exciton-phonon coupling (coherent contributions for hBN); However it seems that this part is missing in the Tutorial.
How can i account for exciton-phonon coupling ?

Best wishes
Martin
Martin Spenke, PhD Student
Theoretisch-Physikalisches Institut
Universität Hamburg, Germany

haseebphysics1
Posts: 169
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 2:48 pm

Re: electron-phonon QP database and exciton-phonon coupling

Post by haseebphysics1 » Sun Jun 14, 2020 7:40 am

I also had the same questions.



Best,
Haseeb Ahmad
MS - Physics,
LUMS - Pakistan

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4209
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: electron-phonon QP database and exciton-phonon coupling

Post by Daniele Varsano » Sun Jun 14, 2020 9:22 am

Dear Haseeb,
can you elaborate a bit more what is the problem you are facing?

Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

haseebphysics1
Posts: 169
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 2:48 pm

Re: electron-phonon QP database and exciton-phonon coupling

Post by haseebphysics1 » Sun Jun 14, 2020 12:56 pm

martinspenke wrote: Wed Dec 28, 2016 5:07 pm Dear Alejandro,

I am trying to do electron-phonon corrections on top of previously calculated g0w0 QP energies; however
when i use GfnQPdb= "E < SAVE/db.QP" , i end up with a bad termination error.

How can i perform electron-phonon calculation on top of g0w0 QP energies, in order to be able to include electron_phonon affected g0w0 QP energies in the subsequent BSE calculations ?
(Otherwise yambo_ph calculates it on top of KS energies, and i loose electron-electron effects.)

Further question, Andrea Marini talks in his seminal PRL paper from 2008 about exciton-phonon coupling (coherent contributions for hBN); However it seems that this part is missing in the Tutorial.
How can i account for exciton-phonon coupling ?

Best wishes
Martin
Dear Daniele,

I made the comment to Martin's question of this thread, which somehow remained unanswered.


Regards,
Haseeb Ahmad
MS - Physics,
LUMS - Pakistan

User avatar
claudio
Posts: 528
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:33 pm
Location: Marseille
Contact:

Re: electron-phonon QP database and exciton-phonon coupling

Post by claudio » Mon Jun 15, 2020 12:55 pm

Dear Martin

I think what you want to do is not correct. Let me explain.
When you construct the electron-phonon self-energy you have at the numerator the electron-phonon
matrix elements and at the denominator the Kohn-Sham energy differences.

if you replace the KS energy differences of the denominator with the GW ones,
you should do the same with the numerator matrix elements.
Otherwise, your self-energy would not be consistent.

Moreover in many cases, but not all cases, there is a cancellation between the GW correction
in the numerator and in the denominator, see the discussion on page 3 in

https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.2285

In the end, if you want to calculate the effect of EPC on the band structure you should start from KS and then add
the relative shift and linewidths to the GW result.

If you want to include GW correction in the EPC calculation, you have to use a code like the one of Steven-Louie
(that I think it is not available)

https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/1 ... 122.186402

or doing it by finite differences

https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/1 ... .93.100301

best regards
Claudio Attaccalite
Claudio Attaccalite
[CNRS/ Aix-Marseille Université/ CINaM laborarory / TSN department
Campus de Luminy – Case 913
13288 MARSEILLE Cedex 09
web site: http://www.attaccalite.com

Locked