Dear users and developers,
For my system (semiconductor), ecutwfc must be at least 100 Ry to convergence, compare to VASP, which just need 38 Ry (PAW)
the value of ecutwfc is too large to carry out following Yambo calculation
In addition, my system include Pb, so SOC effect should be considered.
How should I resolve this problem?
Thanks in advance
Best,
Yang
scf.in
&control
calculation='scf'
restart_mode='from_scratch'
pseudo_dir = './',
outdir = './'
wfcdir = './'
prefix='a',
nstep = 200,
verbosity = 'high'
wf_collect = .true.
/
&system
ibrav = 0,
nat= 50, ntyp= 6,
ecutwfc = 38
lspinorb= .false.
noncolin= .false.
/
&electrons
conv_thr = 1.0d-8
mixing_beta = 0.7
diagonalization = 'david'
/
CELL_PARAMETERS {angstrom}
18.58 0 0
0 6.267 0
0 0 6.466
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Pb 207.2 Pb.rel-pbe-n-nc.UPF
I 126.9 I.rel-pbe-n-nc.UPF
S 32.065 S.rel-pbe-n-nc.UPF
C 12.017 C.rel-pbe-nc.UPF
N 14.006 N.rel-pbe-nc.UPF
H 1.007 H.rel-pbe-n-nc.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal}
Pb 0.500000000 0.394727599 0.217545602
Pb -0.000000000 0.605272431 0.717545631
I 0.500000000 0.884561011 0.296939592
I 0.000000000 0.115438989 0.796939592
I 0.500000000 0.344483771 0.733856670
I -0.000000000 0.655516259 0.233856640
S 0.343479961 0.321804295 0.220015148
S 0.156520039 0.678195675 0.720015133
S 0.843479931 0.678195675 0.720015133
S 0.656520069 0.321804295 0.220015148
C 0.311365212 0.561857292 0.267952701
C 0.188634788 0.438142708 0.767952701
C 0.811365242 0.438142708 0.767952701
C 0.688634758 0.561857292 0.267952701
C 0.358918877 0.845233902 0.813741632
C 0.141081123 0.154766083 0.313741632
C 0.858918877 0.154766083 0.313741632
C 0.641081123 0.845233902 0.813741632
N 0.287089254 0.737337360 0.302407531
N 0.212910746 0.262662640 0.802407561
N 0.787089284 0.262662640 0.802407561
N 0.712910716 0.737337360 0.302407531
N 0.335805706 0.010666556 0.649089402
N 0.164194294 0.989333448 0.149089402
N 0.835805706 0.989333448 0.149089402
N 0.664194294 0.010666556 0.649089402
H 0.292551441 0.107328769 0.703937407
H 0.207448559 0.892671261 0.203937407
H 0.792551411 0.892671261 0.203937407
H 0.707448589 0.107328769 0.703937407
H 0.318986940 0.929479720 0.512734746
H 0.181013060 0.070520276 0.012734746
H 0.818986940 0.070520276 0.012734746
H 0.681013060 0.929479720 0.512734746
H 0.379460721 0.111293329 0.612489917
H 0.120539279 0.888706679 0.112489917
H 0.879460691 0.888706679 0.112489917
H 0.620539309 0.111293329 0.612489917
H 0.379992995 0.930697521 0.949130018
H 0.120007005 0.069302501 0.449130018
H 0.879992965 0.069302501 0.449130018
H 0.620007035 0.930697521 0.949130018
H 0.401037203 0.743481616 0.746125985
H 0.098962797 0.256518369 0.246125985
H 0.901037233 0.256518369 0.246125985
H 0.598962767 0.743481616 0.746125985
H 0.311406405 0.750091955 0.855379639
H 0.188593595 0.249908060 0.355379639
H 0.811406405 0.249908060 0.355379639
H 0.688593595 0.750091955 0.855379639
K_POINTS {automatic}
1 4 4 0 0 0
ecutwfc not converge with NC pseudopotentials
Moderators: myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano, Conor Hogan
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:11 am
- Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4232
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: ecutwfc not converge with NC pseudopotentials
Dear Yang Huang,
The fact you need 100Ry to converge the ground state does not mean that you need all the plane waves for the GW/optics calculations. In general you need much less, even if a large cutoff for ground state would probably imply a big number of G vectors also for Yambo.
I do not know what kind of pseudo you are using anyway recent NC pseudopotentials by Don Hamann (ONCVPSP) are very accurate and softer than the usual one. You can download the code and documentation to generate them in UPF format here:
http://www.mat-simresearch.com/
They are also collected here:
http://www.pseudo-dojo.org/
and in a dedicated github page, but I do not know if in the table (git project) the UPF format needed by QE is supported.
Best,
Daniele
The fact you need 100Ry to converge the ground state does not mean that you need all the plane waves for the GW/optics calculations. In general you need much less, even if a large cutoff for ground state would probably imply a big number of G vectors also for Yambo.
I do not know what kind of pseudo you are using anyway recent NC pseudopotentials by Don Hamann (ONCVPSP) are very accurate and softer than the usual one. You can download the code and documentation to generate them in UPF format here:
http://www.mat-simresearch.com/
They are also collected here:
http://www.pseudo-dojo.org/
and in a dedicated github page, but I do not know if in the table (git project) the UPF format needed by QE is supported.
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:11 am
Re: ecutwfc not converge with NC pseudopotentials
Dear Daniele,
Thank you so much for your kind help!
Best,
Yang
Thank you so much for your kind help!
Best,
Yang