Is the correction for occupation important?

Concerns issues with computing quasiparticle corrections to the DFT eigenvalues - i.e., the self-energy within the GW approximation (-g n), or considering the Hartree-Fock exchange only (-x)

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
zsjan
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:09 am

Is the correction for occupation important?

Post by zsjan » Mon May 18, 2015 8:49 am

Dear all:
After obtaining the energy correction from G0W0, we get a new group of eigenvalues, which should redefine the occupation of elections. So is this occupation correction important for the calculation of optical spectra since the contribution of spectra comes large part from the unoccupied states. Thank you!
Shijun Zhao
College of Engineering
Peking University

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Is the correction for occupation important?

Post by Daniele Varsano » Mon May 18, 2015 9:15 am

Dear Shijun,
of course it depends on the system. In wide gap semiconductor the occupation should not change upon correction. In other system it can make the difference.
Anyway yambo should takes into account the new Fermi level if the energies are read for the QP database (KfnQPdb="E < SAVE/ndb.QP", please check the report file.
If not you can do that by using the following input variable"

Code: Select all

GfnQPdb= "E < SAVE/ndb.QP"
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

zsjan
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:09 am

Re: Is the correction for occupation important?

Post by zsjan » Mon May 18, 2015 9:41 am

Thank you!
So does it indicate that the yambo can recalculate the Fermi level and according occupations if the energies are read for the QP database (KfnQPdb="E < SAVE/ndb.QP"?
Shijun Zhao
College of Engineering
Peking University

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Is the correction for occupation important?

Post by Daniele Varsano » Mon May 18, 2015 10:12 am

It should,
Now I'm not totally sure, check in the report, it should be written, otherwise you can use the variable I reported in the previous post.
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply