Dear all:
I try to calculate the quasiparticle band structure of monolayer MoSe2. I use pwscf to product the database for yambo. The GGA band structure shows that monolayer MoSe2 is direct band gap at K point. However, G0W0 band structure shows this material is indirect band gap, VBM at K point , CBM at gamma-K. I think there is something wrong in my input file of G0W0 calculation. The input and output files are in attachment.
Thanks,
Tieyu Lu
GGA direct band gap to G0W0 indirect band gap
Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:25 am
GGA direct band gap to G0W0 indirect band gap
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Tieyu Lu
Physics Department of Xiamen university (China)
Physics Department of Xiamen university (China)
- Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4198
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: GGA direct band gap to G0W0 indirect band gap
Dear Tieyu Lu,
I'm not expert on this system, so then may be some other can tells you more looking to your band structure.
I can't see anything wrong in your input, anyway at first glance,
here the problem it looks that the interpolation of ypp failed.
This utility has to be improved:
Anyway you can have look to this thread
this one or this one
Here you can find some information that can help you to do a better interpolation.
As first attempt I would try to remove the time-reversal symmetry from your system. This can be done by using:
and uncomment the time-reversal removal. Then run ypp, and redo the setup in the new directory created by ypp.
Anyway I'm not totally sure it will work.
If you are just interested in the gap only and not in the whole band structure, you can include the K points in your sampling: you can use: to generate the K-grids containing the desired point.
Hope it helps,
Daniele
I'm not expert on this system, so then may be some other can tells you more looking to your band structure.
I can't see anything wrong in your input, anyway at first glance,
here the problem it looks that the interpolation of ypp failed.
This utility has to be improved:
Anyway you can have look to this thread
this one or this one
Here you can find some information that can help you to do a better interpolation.
As first attempt I would try to remove the time-reversal symmetry from your system. This can be done by using:
Code: Select all
ypp -n
Anyway I'm not totally sure it will work.
If you are just interested in the gap only and not in the whole band structure, you can include the K points in your sampling: you can use:
Code: Select all
ypp -k
Hope it helps,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:25 am
Re: GGA direct band gap to G0W0 indirect band gap
Thank you for your reply.
Tieyu Lu
Tieyu Lu
Tieyu Lu
Physics Department of Xiamen university (China)
Physics Department of Xiamen university (China)
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:05 am
Re: GGA direct band gap to G0W0 indirect band gap
Dear Tieyu Lu,
I could not find anything wrong in your GW input file as well.
Take into account that the direct-indirect character of the gap for this system is strongly dependent on the xc functional and on the details of the geometry of the slab (lattice constant, position of the S atoms).
Maybe you can look in the literature what functional is used and what lattice constant.
I hope this helps
Margherita
I could not find anything wrong in your GW input file as well.
Take into account that the direct-indirect character of the gap for this system is strongly dependent on the xc functional and on the details of the geometry of the slab (lattice constant, position of the S atoms).
Maybe you can look in the literature what functional is used and what lattice constant.
I hope this helps
Margherita