LRC_alpha

Run-time issues concerning Yambo that are not covered in the above forums.

Moderators: myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano, Conor Hogan

Post Reply
vitoversace
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 3:43 pm

LRC_alpha

Post by vitoversace » Wed May 21, 2014 5:34 pm

Dear Daniele,

1) should the value of LRC_alpha = -8.7 for LiF in the tutorial be changed
if i want to calculate MgO spectrum at TDDFT level or is this a fixed value for all materials ???

2) is it possible in TDDFT to get excitation energies and weights ( ypp -e s , ypp -e a ) like in bse ?
3) are there other types of TDDFT kernel which are based on mapping theory in yambo ?

Bests
Vito
Vito Versace
PhD student
University of York
vitoversace@yahoo.com

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: LRC_alpha

Post by Daniele Varsano » Wed May 21, 2014 11:16 pm

Dear Vito,
1) the LRC kernel you are referring it is not ab-initio, so alpha (which is somehow related to the screening) is a system dependent parameter.
2) Yes it is, if you do the calculation in the electorn-hole KS basis
3) Well, there should be the kernel extracted from the Bethe-Salpeter, so a long range one without empirical parameter (have a look to this paper and this. But I do not know if it is included in the GPL and anyway it gives you the same results of the BSE and the computational effort it is essentially the same.
Hope it helps,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply