Static linear response function real?

Deals with issues related to computation of optical spectra in reciprocal space: RPA, TDDFT, local field effects.

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano, Conor Hogan

Post Reply
Franz Fischer
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 9:36 am

Static linear response function real?

Post by Franz Fischer » Tue Oct 28, 2025 2:10 pm

Hi,

I have a question concerning the linear response function chi, calculated at the Hartree level (i.e. f_xc = 0) and using causal Greens functions.
All static quantities (omega = 0) should in principle be real for all momenta q
So for chi(q,omega), which is the fourier transform of chi(r,t) this should also apply for omega=0 and thus also for epsilon^{-1}_{G,G'}(q, omega=0).

Now I have computed this quantity (epsilon) for a MoS2 monolayer and find some small imaginary part (for G=G' and q .neq. 0).

Why is that? Is the i0+ .neq. 0 in the cheatsheet slide "3) With local fields (RPA-LFE)"?

Thanks in advance!

Best,
Franz
Franz Fischer
PhD student / IMPRS-UFAST fellow
Institute of Physical Chemistry
University of Hamburg

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4292
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Static linear response function real?

Post by Daniele Varsano » Fri Oct 31, 2025 7:42 am

Dear Franz,

yes, this is the i0+ .neq. 0
You can reduce it to a very small value by lowering the value in DmRngeXd.

Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Franz Fischer
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2022 9:36 am

Re: Static linear response function real?

Post by Franz Fischer » Mon Nov 03, 2025 11:28 am

Thanks Daniele!

Best,
Franz
Franz Fischer
PhD student / IMPRS-UFAST fellow
Institute of Physical Chemistry
University of Hamburg

Post Reply