Dear all:
When I judge the convergence of k-mesh by calculating the spectrum, I use different k point densities from 12*12*1 to 24*24*1 for two-dimensional materials with lattice constant of 3.55 angms. For the first absorption peak, I can always see the tiny displacement of the absorption peak in energy, when k=12, the highest peak is 1.88eV,
k=12, ~1.88eV.
k=14, ~1.98eV.
k=16, ~2.06eV.
k=18, ~2.10eV.
k=20, ~2.16eV.
k=24, ~2.22eV.
Although the energy position of the first absorption peak is biased, it is consistent with the light absorption intensity. Does it look like we still haven't reached the point k of convergence? I appreciate any guidance and tutorial on that!
Best,
sunxl
The problem of convergence at point k
Moderators: Davide Sangalli, claudio, myrta gruning
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2024 8:05 am
- Location: China
The problem of convergence at point k
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Dr. sunxl
Beijing Computing Science Research Center, China.
Beijing Computing Science Research Center, China.
- Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4198
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: The problem of convergence at point k
Dear sunxl,
please sign your post with your name and affiliation, it is a rule for the forum! You can do this once for all by filling the signature in the user profile.
Yes, it seems that convergence is very slow. My advice is to increase the grid point uniformly in terms of k spacing, ie Nkx and Nky proportional to the unit cell lengths.
Best,
Daniele
please sign your post with your name and affiliation, it is a rule for the forum! You can do this once for all by filling the signature in the user profile.
Yes, it seems that convergence is very slow. My advice is to increase the grid point uniformly in terms of k spacing, ie Nkx and Nky proportional to the unit cell lengths.
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2024 8:05 am
- Location: China
Re: The problem of convergence at point k
Dear Daniele:
Thank you for your advice. For my material lattice parameter of a=b=3.55 angstroms, do you mean that I should continue to increase k points until convergence?
Thank you for your advice. For my material lattice parameter of a=b=3.55 angstroms, do you mean that I should continue to increase k points until convergence?
Dr. sunxl
Beijing Computing Science Research Center, China.
Beijing Computing Science Research Center, China.
- Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4198
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: The problem of convergence at point k
Dear sunxl,
in this case your sampling is uniform, and you will need to increase the sampling if you aim at a tighter convergence.
Best,
Daniele
in this case your sampling is uniform, and you will need to increase the sampling if you aim at a tighter convergence.
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/