Ciao,
I am running the truncated Coulomb potential for 2D materials. If I change the initial position of the layer in QE, e.g. moving a graphene layer from z=0 to z=0.5 (in direct coordinate), the GW corrections have a difference about 5-15 meV. Is this something that I should worry about? Or I should just keep the atomic positions in z=0, as demonstrated in the tutorial on monolayer BN? Thank you in advance!
Best regards,
Bo
Initial layer position for 2D Coulomb truncation
Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:47 pm
Initial layer position for 2D Coulomb truncation
Dr Bo Peng
Nevile Research Fellow, Magdalene College
Theory of Condensed Matter Group, Cavendish Laboratory
University of Cambridge
https://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/profiles/bp432
https://www.magd.cam.ac.uk/user/peng
Nevile Research Fellow, Magdalene College
Theory of Condensed Matter Group, Cavendish Laboratory
University of Cambridge
https://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/profiles/bp432
https://www.magd.cam.ac.uk/user/peng
- Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4198
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Initial layer position for 2D Coulomb truncation
Dear Bo,
actually, this should not happen, and if I'm not wrong the potential component (ndb.cutoff) should be the same in the two cases, and the reason of the discrepancy should be ascribed to something else. Anyway, if you are not interested in extreme accuracy, the difference is rather small.
Also, we have developed a much better way to treat 2D systems, it will be released very soon and the actual 2D cutoff will be dismissed.
Best,
Daniele
actually, this should not happen, and if I'm not wrong the potential component (ndb.cutoff) should be the same in the two cases, and the reason of the discrepancy should be ascribed to something else. Anyway, if you are not interested in extreme accuracy, the difference is rather small.
Also, we have developed a much better way to treat 2D systems, it will be released very soon and the actual 2D cutoff will be dismissed.
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:47 pm
Re: Initial layer position for 2D Coulomb truncation
Thank you Daniele! Look forward to the new release!
Dr Bo Peng
Nevile Research Fellow, Magdalene College
Theory of Condensed Matter Group, Cavendish Laboratory
University of Cambridge
https://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/profiles/bp432
https://www.magd.cam.ac.uk/user/peng
Nevile Research Fellow, Magdalene College
Theory of Condensed Matter Group, Cavendish Laboratory
University of Cambridge
https://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/profiles/bp432
https://www.magd.cam.ac.uk/user/peng