Dear developers,
I am trying to use Yambo in order to improve the DFT's band gap of my system.
I have this problem that Yambo sees my system as Metallic, while the band gap is 0.4 eV.
[WARNING]Metallic system
How could I get band gap correction when Yambo sees my system as metallic?!
Metallic system
Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, Daniele Varsano
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 5:09 pm
Metallic system
Taouil Lamia
University of Mohammed V
Faculty of science - Rabat
Morocco
University of Mohammed V
Faculty of science - Rabat
Morocco
- Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4209
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Metallic system
Dear Lamia,
the system is seen as metallic by yambo or it is already metallic in the QE ground state calculation?
If it is not the case, can you post your QE output and r_setup?
Best,
Daniele
the system is seen as metallic by yambo or it is already metallic in the QE ground state calculation?
If it is not the case, can you post your QE output and r_setup?
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 5:09 pm
Re: Metallic system
Dear Daniele,
Thank you for your reply.
The attached is the output and r_setup files.
Best,
Lamia
Thank you for your reply.
The attached is the output and r_setup files.
Best,
Lamia
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Taouil Lamia
University of Mohammed V
Faculty of science - Rabat
Morocco
University of Mohammed V
Faculty of science - Rabat
Morocco
- Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4209
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Metallic system
Dear Lamia,
some suggestions:
if the system is a semiconductor, try to run QE using the occupation fixed (no smearing).
Next, yambo cannot perform a GW calculation not because of the metallicity but because you have a non-uniform grid:
In order to overcame this problem first have a look to the QE messages:
Try to use the correct ibrav.
If this not solve the problem in the yambo setup, you can add this flag in the yambo setup input:
Best,
Daniele
some suggestions:
if the system is a semiconductor, try to run QE using the occupation fixed (no smearing).
Next, yambo cannot perform a GW calculation not because of the metallicity but because you have a non-uniform grid:
Code: Select all
[WARNING][RL indx] 2 equivalent points in the rlu grid found
[RL indx] X grid is not uniform. Gamma point only.
[WR./SAVE//ndb.kindx]---------------------------------------
Fragmentation :no
Polarization last K : 90
QP states : 1 90
X grid is uniform :no
BS scattering :no
COLL scattering :no
Code: Select all
Message from routine setup:
no reason to have ecutrho>4*ecutwfc
Message from routine setup:
using ibrav=0 with symmetry is DISCOURAGED, use correct ibrav instead
If this not solve the problem in the yambo setup, you can add this flag in the yambo setup input:
Code: Select all
NoDiagSC
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 5:09 pm
Re: Metallic system
Dear Daniele,
The system that I'm working on is a semiconductor. It doesn't work even with the suggestions. Any other solutions, please ?
Best,
Lamia
The system that I'm working on is a semiconductor. It doesn't work even with the suggestions. Any other solutions, please ?
Best,
Lamia
Taouil Lamia
University of Mohammed V
Faculty of science - Rabat
Morocco
University of Mohammed V
Faculty of science - Rabat
Morocco
- Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4209
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Metallic system
Dear Lamia,
I think you should solve first the problem of the non-uniform k point grid.
This should be achieved by defining an appropriate ibrav and an automatic k point sampling (possibly centred at gamma, which is not now the case).
Best,
Daniele
I think you should solve first the problem of the non-uniform k point grid.
This should be achieved by defining an appropriate ibrav and an automatic k point sampling (possibly centred at gamma, which is not now the case).
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/