Only reflectivity not RAS

Concerns any physical issues arising during the setup step (-i option). This includes problems with symmetries, k/q-point sets, and so on. For technical problems (running in parallel, etc), refer to the Technical forum.

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
burkzdemir
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:57 pm

Only reflectivity not RAS

Post by burkzdemir » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:57 pm

I want to calculate the reflectivity of a slab structure. Can I use the real-space cutoff option for epsilon in yambo -o c / -o b calculations not in RAS calculations?
Burak Ozdemir
Post-doc,
University of Nantes, France

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 3816
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Only reflectivity not RAS

Post by Daniele Varsano » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:04 pm

Dear Burak,
the cutoff coulomb potential it is meant to avoid spurious interaction in non-periodic direction in non3D systems.
It is not related to any specific kind of calculation, where did you find that it is related to the RAS?
Anyway, the cutoff potential it is not in real space, but in reciprocal space (see Phys. Rev. B 73, 205119 (2006).).
NB: if you plan to use a box shape for your slab, have in mind that the side of the box have to be doubled, it is discussed in the forum.
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

burkzdemir
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: Only reflectivity not RAS

Post by burkzdemir » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:12 pm

I read about the cutoff used in RAS calculation mentioned in the yambo web-site (http://www.yambo-code.org/tutorials/Sur ... /index.php).

Cutoff # [RAS] Cutoff mode (Uncomment to use)
CutZero= 0.250000 # [RAS] Zero position of cutoff fn (Frac)
CutStep= 0.500000 # [RAS] Width of cutoff function (Frac)
Burak Ozdemir
Post-doc,
University of Nantes, France

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 3816
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Only reflectivity not RAS

Post by Daniele Varsano » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:23 pm

Dear Burak,
I understand now, you mean the "boxcar" function used to calculate the alpha_surf, introduced here:
C. Hogan, R. DelSole, G. Onida, Phys. Rev. B 68 (2003) 035405.
while I was talking about reciprocal space cutoff, sorry for the misunderstanding.
Unfortunately I cannot help on that, but people working with surface with yambo will give you the answer.
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

User avatar
Conor Hogan
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Only reflectivity not RAS

Post by Conor Hogan » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:47 am

Dear Burak,
The RAS module will also generate the files o.eps_cell-rpa which contain the cell dielectric tensors including the cutoff. From these, you can compute whatever you like (using standard relations for Fresnel reflectivity, or perhaps more advanced ones including the slab anisotropy/light polarization). However I would recommend doing everything first without cutoff and a symmetric slab, to make sure that you scale the components correctly.
The real space cutoff can only be used however for the basic level: RPA without local fields.
Conor
Dr. Conor Hogan
CNR-ISM, via Fosso del Cavaliere, 00133 Roma, Italy;
Department of Physics and European Theoretical Spectroscopy Facility (ETSF),
University of Rome "Tor Vergata".

burkzdemir
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: Only reflectivity not RAS

Post by burkzdemir » Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:47 am

Can it be used for RPA+Drude?
Burak Ozdemir
Post-doc,
University of Nantes, France

User avatar
Conor Hogan
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Only reflectivity not RAS

Post by Conor Hogan » Mon Nov 10, 2014 12:15 pm

It should work, yes, although I've never tried it. The surface spectra module is (more or less) just a driver for the normal optics routines, and so the subroutine X_Drude is called in the normal manner.
Dr. Conor Hogan
CNR-ISM, via Fosso del Cavaliere, 00133 Roma, Italy;
Department of Physics and European Theoretical Spectroscopy Facility (ETSF),
University of Rome "Tor Vergata".

Post Reply