energy gap is small than the excitation energy

Anything regarding the post-processing utility (e.g. excitonic wavefunction analysis) is dealt with in this forum.

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
ljzhou86
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 10:20 am

energy gap is small than the excitation energy

Post by ljzhou86 » Fri Nov 08, 2013 5:16 am

Dear all

I want to use ‘ypp’ to analyze the optical transitions after a BSE calculation. Firstly, I got the files named o.exc_E_sorted using ‘ypp –e s’. In o.exc_E_sorted, I can find such infos:
# E [ev] Strength Index
3.503 0.3076E-6 1.0000
3.50 0.292E-10 2.00
3.503 0.1735E-8 3.000
3.50910 0.01435 4.00000
3.510 0.3280E-6 5.000
3.510 0.5677E-7 6.000
3.512 0.2804E-6 7.000
…….
Then, I use ‘ypp –e a’ to see the E-H pairs that contributes to Excitonic State 4. In o.exc_weights_at_4 file, I got such data:
# Electron-Hole pairs that contributes to Excitonic State 4 more than 5%
#
# K-point [iku] Weight
# 0.000000 0.333333 0.000000 0.525244
# 0.000000 0.333333 0.200000 0.999929
# 0.000000 -0.333333 0.200000 1.000000
#
# Band_V Band_C K ibz Symm. Weight Energy
#
24.00000 25.00000 10.00000 2.00000 0.50260 2.16800
24.00000 25.00000 5.00000 2.00000 0.50242 2.16800
24.00000 25.00000 10.00000 5.00000 0.50239 2.16800
24.00000 25.00000 5.00000 5.00000 0.50231 2.16800
24.00000 25.00000 10.00000 6.00000 0.50226 2.16800
24.00000 25.00000 5.00000 3.00000 0.50216 2.16800
….. …..

My question is why the energy gap between Band_V24 to Band_V25 (2.168 eV) is smaller than the excitation energy (3.5091 eV)? If I am not wrong, the energy of bands transition minus the excitation energy is the binding energy of the exciton, so the binding energy is negative for this excitation?


Best Regards
Jiaxu Yan
Dr. Zhou Liu-Jiang
Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350002

Post Reply