BDmRange in BSE calculation
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:22 am
Dear all,
I have finished a BSE calculation, attached please find the BSE spectra. The yambo.in file is as following:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
em1s # [R Xs] Static Inverse Dielectric Matrix
optics # [R OPT] Optics
bse # [R BSK] Bethe Salpeter Equation.
bss # [R BSS] Bethe Salpeter Equation solver
BSresKmod= "xc" # [BSK] Resonant Kernel mode. (`x`;`c`;`d`)
BScplKmod= "none" # [BSK] Coupling Kernel mode. (`x`;`c`;`d`;`u`)
% BSEBands
14 | 21 | # [BSK] Bands range
%
BSENGBlk= 400 RL # [BSK] Screened interaction block size
BSENGexx= 11733 RL # [BSK] Exchange components
% QpntsRXs
1 | 43 | # [Xs] Transferred momenta
%
% BndsRnXs
1 | 250 | # [Xs] Polarization function bands
%
NGsBlkXs= 400 RL # [Xs] Response block size
% LongDrXs
1.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | # [Xs] [cc] Electric Field
%
BSSmod= "h" # [BSS] Solvers `h/d/i/t`
% BEnRange
0.00000 | 20.00000 | eV # [BSS] Energy range
%
% BDmRange
0.100000 | 0.200000 | eV # [BSS] Damping range
%
BEnSteps= 1000 # [BSS] Energy steps
% BLongDir
1.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | # [BSS] [cc] Electric Field
%
KfnQPdb= "E < ./SAVE/ndb.QP"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The point is that the resulting spectra changes so greatly when the variable "BDmRange" changes. I think this is very strange. So, could you please tell me the reason for this great change? Does it have something to do with the dense of the K-point mesh in DFT calculation?
Thank you so much!
I have finished a BSE calculation, attached please find the BSE spectra. The yambo.in file is as following:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
em1s # [R Xs] Static Inverse Dielectric Matrix
optics # [R OPT] Optics
bse # [R BSK] Bethe Salpeter Equation.
bss # [R BSS] Bethe Salpeter Equation solver
BSresKmod= "xc" # [BSK] Resonant Kernel mode. (`x`;`c`;`d`)
BScplKmod= "none" # [BSK] Coupling Kernel mode. (`x`;`c`;`d`;`u`)
% BSEBands
14 | 21 | # [BSK] Bands range
%
BSENGBlk= 400 RL # [BSK] Screened interaction block size
BSENGexx= 11733 RL # [BSK] Exchange components
% QpntsRXs
1 | 43 | # [Xs] Transferred momenta
%
% BndsRnXs
1 | 250 | # [Xs] Polarization function bands
%
NGsBlkXs= 400 RL # [Xs] Response block size
% LongDrXs
1.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | # [Xs] [cc] Electric Field
%
BSSmod= "h" # [BSS] Solvers `h/d/i/t`
% BEnRange
0.00000 | 20.00000 | eV # [BSS] Energy range
%
% BDmRange
0.100000 | 0.200000 | eV # [BSS] Damping range
%
BEnSteps= 1000 # [BSS] Energy steps
% BLongDir
1.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | # [BSS] [cc] Electric Field
%
KfnQPdb= "E < ./SAVE/ndb.QP"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The point is that the resulting spectra changes so greatly when the variable "BDmRange" changes. I think this is very strange. So, could you please tell me the reason for this great change? Does it have something to do with the dense of the K-point mesh in DFT calculation?
Thank you so much!