The relationship between K-point and QP states
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2025 2:17 am
Dear all,
Before performing Yambo calculations, I tested two different K-point grids, 20×20×1 and 36×36×1. I attached the input and output files for both self-consistent and non-self-consistent QE calculations. After conducting YAMBO processing, I obtained the r_setup file. I noticed an issue with the reported K and Q points in this file. For instance, in the r_setup file for the 20×20×1 grid, the IBZ Q-points are shown as 44, matching the IBZ K-points at 44, and the QP states are 1 44, which seems normal. However, in the 36×36×1 grid results, the IBZ Q-points are 127, identical to the IBZ K-points, yet the QP states are 1 127. I am seeking clarification on this discrepancy; could you advise which scenario is correct?
Yours sincerely, WangQi
Before performing Yambo calculations, I tested two different K-point grids, 20×20×1 and 36×36×1. I attached the input and output files for both self-consistent and non-self-consistent QE calculations. After conducting YAMBO processing, I obtained the r_setup file. I noticed an issue with the reported K and Q points in this file. For instance, in the r_setup file for the 20×20×1 grid, the IBZ Q-points are shown as 44, matching the IBZ K-points at 44, and the QP states are 1 44, which seems normal. However, in the 36×36×1 grid results, the IBZ Q-points are 127, identical to the IBZ K-points, yet the QP states are 1 127. I am seeking clarification on this discrepancy; could you advise which scenario is correct?
Yours sincerely, WangQi