Issues with GW Band Convergence

Concerns issues with computing quasiparticle corrections to the DFT eigenvalues - i.e., the self-energy within the GW approximation (-g n), or considering the Hartree-Fock exchange only (-x)

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
sunxl
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2024 8:05 am
Location: China

Issues with GW Band Convergence

Post by sunxl » Thu Dec 05, 2024 1:46 am

Dear all,

1、When calculating GW band structures, the tutorial recommends converging certain parameters using the variation of the direct band gap as the criterion. If my structure has an indirect band gap, I would like to perform convergence tests quickly. Can I assess convergence by calculating the direct band gap?

2、When performing convergence on GbndRnge, what is the acceptable error in eV to consider it converged?

Thank you in advance for your help.

Best,
sunxl
Dr. sunxl
Beijing Computing Science Research Center, China.

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Issues with GW Band Convergence

Post by Daniele Varsano » Thu Dec 05, 2024 8:45 am

Dear sunxl,

1) In general, you can check the convergence on the direct band gap. In any case, looking directly to the indirect gap is not an issue in the sense that does not add computational burden, as you can set the QPkrange as:

Code: Select all

%QPkrange                        # [GW] QP generalized Kpoint/Band indices
k1|k1|b1|b1|
k2|k2|b2|b2|
%
where k1,b1 and the MVB and k2,b2 are the mCB.

2) This really depends on the precision you need. In general, I do not think that looking for a convergence criteria smaller than few tenth of meV is a good idea.


Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply