Page 2 of 2

Re: GW yambo error

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2022 3:30 pm
by hammouri
Thank you, Daniele!
If the indirect band gap is located at two different points, say between 1 and 49. When I run convergence calculations, for which k point I should make graphs? Is it 1, 49, or the full range from 1-49.
Also, in the output below, the indirect band gap location is different from DFT and Hartree. See below:

Code: Select all

  [X] Direct Gap                                    :  2.479373 [eV]
  [X] Direct Gap localized at k-point               :  1
  [X] Indirect Gap                                  :  1.590475 [eV]
  [X] Indirect Gap between k-points                 :   80    1
  [Hartree-Fock] Direct Gap                         :  10.40613 [eV]
  [Hartree-Fock] Direct Gap localized at k-point    :  1
  [Hartree-Fock] Indirect Gap                       :  7.446659 [eV]
  [Hartree-Fock] Indirect Gap between k-points      :   49    1

Re: GW yambo error

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2022 10:07 pm
by Daniele Varsano
Dear Hammouri,

in order to compare the gaps between DFT and HF you need to calculate the correction for all the k points.
Next convergence tests can be done by looking at the gap in few k points (e.g. direct gap at gamma points and indirect gap).

Best,
Daniele