E_sorted excitons for BSE-slepc

You can find here problems arising when using old releases of Yambo (< 5.0). Issues as parallelization strategy, performance issues and other technical aspects.

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano, Conor Hogan

Locked
Zafer Kandemir
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed May 06, 2020 9:43 am
Contact:

E_sorted excitons for BSE-slepc

Post by Zafer Kandemir » Fri Mar 18, 2022 10:43 am

Dear Developers,

I used the BSE-slepc solver for metallic systems. After BSE calculation, I apply "ypp -e s 1".
I have attached the logic, report, and outcome files for my calculation. I couldn't figure out why the exciton sortings are uneven. Can excitons take place in negative energy levels? Or did I perform the BSE calculation wrong?

Best regards,
Zafer
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Dr. Zafer Kandemir
Postdoctoral Researcher
Department of Mechatranics Engineering, Sabanci University
Istanbul, Turkey

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 3810
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: E_sorted excitons for BSE-slepc

Post by Daniele Varsano » Fri Mar 18, 2022 2:49 pm

Dear Zafer,
I suspect that the problem here is due to the fact that you have a metallic system but the metallic character in the screening for q=0 (inraband contribution, Drude term) is not taken into account. The problem can be mitigated by considering larger and larger k point grids.

Anyway, are you sure that you need BSE for the absorption of a metal? Usually, the IP approximation is a good one for metals.

We are now working to include metallic terms in the code, in particular for GW, and hopefully it will be ready soon.
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Locked