G0W0 calculations on double grid
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:10 pm
Dear YAMBO developers and users,
I'm currently trying to run a G0W0 calculation exploiting the double grid feature. I performed an nscf run on a dense grid (32x32x1) and in the coarse grid (9x9x1) SAVE I successfully created the ndb.DoubleGrid database. However, when I run the G0W0 calculation on the coarse grid, even though in the report and logfile I notice that YAMBO uses the fine grid I get a gap result that is extremely close (just 1 or 2 meV away) to the straightforward coarse grid calculation (without double grid).
What am I missing? I would expect a bigger impact of the double grid on the GW calculation. I also tried with a finer coarse grid (14x14x1) but the outcome did not change, the double-grid result is very close to the coarse one.
I'm attaching the input, report and logfiles of my calculations.
Thank you very much for your help!
Best,
Michele
I'm currently trying to run a G0W0 calculation exploiting the double grid feature. I performed an nscf run on a dense grid (32x32x1) and in the coarse grid (9x9x1) SAVE I successfully created the ndb.DoubleGrid database. However, when I run the G0W0 calculation on the coarse grid, even though in the report and logfile I notice that YAMBO uses the fine grid I get a gap result that is extremely close (just 1 or 2 meV away) to the straightforward coarse grid calculation (without double grid).
What am I missing? I would expect a bigger impact of the double grid on the GW calculation. I also tried with a finer coarse grid (14x14x1) but the outcome did not change, the double-grid result is very close to the coarse one.
I'm attaching the input, report and logfiles of my calculations.
Thank you very much for your help!
Best,
Michele