pros and cons of real-time method in nonlinear response calculation
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2020 7:55 am
Dear all,
I used sum over states method in IPA to calculate the second-harmonic susceptibility in my research work. However, it is prevented from counting the excitonic effect in the calculation because of increase of the computational cost as mentioned in yambo's real-time method paper[1]. I am very interesting in migrate to using yambo to achieve my purpose. Before I start using the real-time method I have the several questions in my mind:
1) In terms of computational cost, how much of the cost does the real-time method reduce for the same precision?
2) Are there any advantages of sum over states method that real-time method cannot replace?
Looking forward to your reply.
Regards,
Jason
[1] Attaccalite, C., 2016. Non-linear response in extended systems: a real-time approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.09639.
I used sum over states method in IPA to calculate the second-harmonic susceptibility in my research work. However, it is prevented from counting the excitonic effect in the calculation because of increase of the computational cost as mentioned in yambo's real-time method paper[1]. I am very interesting in migrate to using yambo to achieve my purpose. Before I start using the real-time method I have the several questions in my mind:
1) In terms of computational cost, how much of the cost does the real-time method reduce for the same precision?
2) Are there any advantages of sum over states method that real-time method cannot replace?
Looking forward to your reply.
Regards,
Jason
[1] Attaccalite, C., 2016. Non-linear response in extended systems: a real-time approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.09639.