Weight of excitation

Anything regarding the post-processing utility (e.g. excitonic wavefunction analysis) is dealt with in this forum.

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
xtbu
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 4:15 am

Weight of excitation

Post by xtbu » Thu Dec 19, 2019 2:19 am

Dear developers,
I am wondering about the wieght in ypp output inducing from ypp -e a as:

Code: Select all

#    Band_V       Band_C       K  ibz       Symm.        Weight       Energy
#    
     32.0000      33.0000     12.0000       6.0000       0.1080       1.4859
     32.0000      33.0000     12.0000       5.0000       0.1080       1.4859
     32.0000      33.0000     12.0000       4.0000       0.1080       1.4859
     31.00        34.00        12.0        6.000       0.6421E-1     1.506   
     31.00        34.00        12.0        5.000       0.6419E-1     1.506   
     31.00        34.00        12.0        4.000       0.6419E-1     1.506
If I want to konw the contributions of the trasition, like 32-33 as above, I need to count the contribution 0.108x3 or just 0.108?
An other thing is the total weight are not equal 1, far less than 1. Why?

Thanks!

xt Bu
X. T. Bu
Beijing Institute of Technology, China

User avatar
Davide Sangalli
Posts: 614
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 4:49 pm
Location: Via Salaria Km 29.3, CP 10, 00016, Monterotondo Stazione, Italy
Contact:

Re: Weight of excitation

Post by Davide Sangalli » Thu Dec 19, 2019 3:18 pm

Dear Xiangtian Bu,
you should count 0.108x3

The total weight is not 1 because, in the output are reported only the weights of the most relevant transitions.
There is a default threshold at 5% of the total weight. You can lower the threshold via the variable "Weight_treshold"

Best,
D.
Davide Sangalli, PhD
CNR-ISM, Division of Ultrafast Processes in Materials (FLASHit) and MaX Centre
https://sites.google.com/view/davidesangalli
http://www.max-centre.eu/

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 3808
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Weight of excitation

Post by Daniele Varsano » Thu Dec 19, 2019 6:28 pm

Dear Xiangtian Bu,

the variable controlling the threshold of the transition printed in the output is "MinWeight" that will be substituted with "Weight_treshold" in the next release.
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

User avatar
claudio
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Weight of excitation

Post by claudio » Fri Dec 20, 2019 9:36 am

Dear Xiangtian Bu,

probably the name Weight is not so correct, it should be better to call it "percentage contribution" to the exciton

best
Claudio
Claudio Attaccalite
[CNRS/ Aix-Marseille Université/ CINaM laborarory / TSN department
Campus de Luminy – Case 913
13288 MARSEILLE Cedex 09
web site: http://www.attaccalite.com

xtbu
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 4:15 am

Re: Weight of excitation

Post by xtbu » Mon Apr 27, 2020 10:38 am

Thanks, Davide, Daniele and Claudio,
So is the weight stands for |A_eh|^2?Where the A is the prefactor of |S>?
Thanks!

Xiangtian
X. T. Bu
Beijing Institute of Technology, China

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 3808
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Weight of excitation

Post by Daniele Varsano » Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:22 am

Dear Xiangtian,

yes, the weight is defined as you indicated.

Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

xtbu
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 4:15 am

Re: Weight of excitation

Post by xtbu » Thu May 21, 2020 10:39 am

Dear all,
I got the exciton dipoles as described here"http://www.yambo-code.org/wiki/index.ph ... e_excitons".
And it is |A_eh<e|D|h>|, and whose square is proportional to oscillator strength. And I obtained the dipoles through Residuals as decroced here as :
Res=8pi/(q^2\Omega Nq)*|BS_R|^2. But why the two method has a different value of dipoles? I think |A_eh<e|D|h>|^2 should be equal as |BS_R|^2 here.

Thanks!

Xiang tiang
X. T. Bu
Beijing Institute of Technology, China

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 3808
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Weight of excitation

Post by Daniele Varsano » Thu May 21, 2020 11:07 am

Dear Xiang,

I'm not sure I've understood your question,
I think |A_eh<e|D|h>|^2 should be equal as |BS_R|^2 here.
This is correct, these are the weighted transition dipoles, and the residuals are defined as you say, by multiplying them by a prefactor.
Maybe can be useful to look at this thread.

Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

pyadav
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2020 2:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Weight of excitation

Post by pyadav » Wed Aug 17, 2022 7:22 am

Dear team Yambo,

How can I get a rough estimate of the size/radius of the lowest energy exciton in any material after BSE calculation.

Thank you,
Pushpendra
Pushpendra Yadav
Ph.D. Research Scholar
Quantum Transport and Theory Group
Department of Physics
Indian Instittute of Technology Kanpur, India.

https://sites.google.com/site/amitkag1/

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 3808
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Weight of excitation

Post by Daniele Varsano » Wed Aug 17, 2022 10:03 am

Dear Pushpendra,

you can have an estimation by plotting the corresponding exictonic wave function, e.g. in 1D where the two other dimensions are averaged and then fit the envelope function with a hydrogenic wave function in the case it applies.

Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply