Excitonic wavefunction is asymmetric
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 10:00 pm
Dear developers,
When I calculated BN with a N vacancy, I find the lowest excitonic wavefunction is asymmetric, although the structure has a C3 symmetry. Please see details,
When K points is 3 3 1, and put hole position at the centre of defect,
[img] [/img]
it is asymmetric. And I put hole on a asymmetry position,
[img] [/img]
it's strange, the wavefunction is symmetric. Obviously, it is unreasonable.
When K points is set as 4 4 1, and put hole position at the centre of defect, the symmetry will become better than that of 3 3 1 k-points.
[img] [/img]
So, that's very strange. In fact, if hole is on the symmetric position, wavefunction should be symmetric and symmetry should not depend on the K points.
Can you tell me what's wrong? Can you tell me how to work in code?
Best
Ke
Rensselaer polytechnic institute, Troy, NY, US
Hunan university, changsha, Hunan, China
When I calculated BN with a N vacancy, I find the lowest excitonic wavefunction is asymmetric, although the structure has a C3 symmetry. Please see details,
When K points is 3 3 1, and put hole position at the centre of defect,
[img] [/img]
it is asymmetric. And I put hole on a asymmetry position,
[img] [/img]
it's strange, the wavefunction is symmetric. Obviously, it is unreasonable.
When K points is set as 4 4 1, and put hole position at the centre of defect, the symmetry will become better than that of 3 3 1 k-points.
[img] [/img]
So, that's very strange. In fact, if hole is on the symmetric position, wavefunction should be symmetric and symmetry should not depend on the K points.
Can you tell me what's wrong? Can you tell me how to work in code?
Best
Ke
Rensselaer polytechnic institute, Troy, NY, US
Hunan university, changsha, Hunan, China