non-linear response

Deals with issues related to computation of optical spectra in reciprocal space: RPA, TDDFT, local field effects.

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano, Conor Hogan

Marzieh
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:46 pm

Re: non-linear response

Post by Marzieh » Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:41 pm

Dear Claudio,
As I mentioned I tried to increase kpoint but I had some errors...


Best,
Marzieh
Marzieh Ghoohestani, PhD
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences,
Université Catholique de Louvain,
8 Chemin des étoiles, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
https://uclouvain.be/en/directories/marzieh.ghoohestani

User avatar
claudio
Posts: 452
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:33 pm
Contact:

Re: non-linear response

Post by claudio » Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:13 am

Dear Marzieh

you used too many bands in that example, please try to increase k-points but keep the number of bands low
to begin just 3 valence and 3 conduction and then if it works
you can increase it

best
Claudio
Claudio Attaccalite
[CNRS/ Aix-Marseille Université/ CINaM laborarory / TSN department
Campus de Luminy – Case 913
13288 MARSEILLE Cedex 09
web site: http://www.attaccalite.com

Marzieh
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:46 pm

Re: non-linear response-LiNbO3

Post by Marzieh » Mon May 24, 2021 12:26 pm

Dear nonlinear-optics developers,

I tried to calculate SHG within IPA for LiNbO3
https://materialsproject.org/materials/mp-3731/#

But I have gotten different results from the others.

I tried with this structure

znucl 3 41 8
xred
0.2828320000 0.2828320000 0.2828320000
0.7828320000 0.7828320000 0.7828320000
7.6900000000d-04 7.6900000000d-04 7.6900000000d-04
0.5007690000 0.5007690000 0.5007690000
0.3603160000 0.1096320000 0.7200510000
0.1096320000 0.7200510000 0.3603160000
0.7200510000 0.3603160000 0.1096320000
0.6096320000 0.8603160000 0.2200510000
0.8603160000 0.2200510000 0.6096320000
0.2200510000 0.6096320000 0.8603160000
acell 1.0 1.0 1.0
rprim
9.3450774110 -4.9350103258 0.0000000000
9.3450774110 4.9350103258 0.0000000000
6.7389636714 0.0000000000 8.1407095983


by seting this parameters
% NLBands
10 | 50 | # [NL] Bands range
% NLEnRange
0.050000 | 0.250000 | eV # [NL] Energy range

then I got:

**************************************************************************
d*xx>>>4 dxxx=3.823870962 dyxx=0 dzxx=11.645831326
************************************************************************
d*yy>>>>> dxyy=11.822712078 dyyy=0 dzyy=−14.269915299
************************************************************************
d*zz>>>>> dxzz=−12.660339895 dyzz=0 dzzz=−3.989204553
************************************************************************
d*xy>>>>>>dxxy= −3.999656084 dyxy=−11.710313085 dzxy=-1.312199136
**************************************************************************
d*yz>>>>dxyz=−12.24167857 dyyz=−14.233477993 dzyz=−9.129436665
**************************************************************************
d*xz>>>>dxxz=7.26364815 dyxz=0 dzxz=−8.719637359
***************************************************************************

I also tried with this:
and
znucl 3 8 41
xred
0.2810000000 0.2810000000 0.2810000000
0.7810000000 0.7810000000 0.7810000000
0.1124000000 0.3587100000 0.7214900000
0.7214900000 0.1124000000 0.3587100000
0.3587100000 0.7214900000 0.1124000000
0.8587100000 0.6124000000 0.2214900000
0.2214900000 0.8587100000 0.6124000000
0.6124000000 0.2214900000 0.8587100000
0.0000000000 0.0000000000 0.0000000000
0.5000000000 0.5000000000 0.5000000000
acell 1.0 1.0 1.0
rprim
4.8565957949 2.8039568896 8.7179359012
-4.8565957949 2.8039568896 8.7179359012
0.0000000000 -5.6079137791 8.7179359012


and I got:

**********************************************************************
d*xx>>>>dxxx=0 dyxx=8.101777808 dzxx=-13.125208298
**********************************************************************
d*yy>>>>>>dxyy=0 dyyy=-8.103384704 dzyy=-13.125020421
**********************************************************************
d*zz>>>>dxzz=0 dyzz=0 dzzz=8.360502428
***********************************************************************
d*xy>>>>>>dxxy=0 dyxy=17.094932578 dzxy=-2.382431583
************************************************************************
d*yz>>>>>>>dxyz=8.100493673 dyyz=0 dzyz=−13.125148604
*************************************************************************
d*xz>>>>dxxz= −13.04448687 dyxz=4.051115738 dzxz=-−2.382835821
*************************************************************************


While I have gotten this results by using abinit:
Non-linear optical coefficients d (pm/V)
0.000000 0.000000 -0.000000 -0.000000 -8.692208 1.702558
1.702558 -1.702558 -0.000000 -8.692208 -0.000000 0.000000
-8.692208 -8.692208 -28.510734 -0.000000 -0.000000 -0.000000

Also other result repotted for d333:

table2-paper : https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1 ... 56202/meta
abinit − 30 . 21
experminet − 41 . 7
experiment − 37 . 5

tableIII paper:https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/1 ... evB.1.3494

-37.5

Table VI- paper3:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/159516
-27

May I ask you please guid me to fix this issue?

Best,
Marzieh
Marzieh Ghoohestani, PhD
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences,
Université Catholique de Louvain,
8 Chemin des étoiles, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
https://uclouvain.be/en/directories/marzieh.ghoohestani

Post Reply