I was reading this: http://www.yambo-code.org/wiki/index.ph ... s#NGsBlkXd
regarding the screening part. Since I'm still studying it in a depper way, I may have misunderstood it. Thanks, I will try to re-do these calculations with this input file, that should be correct, right?
Problem in parallelization
Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano, Conor Hogan
-
Laura Caputo
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2021 3:02 pm
Re: Problem in parallelization
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Laura Caputo
Ph.D. Student
Université Catholique de Louvain
https://uclouvain.be/fr/repertoires/laura.caputo
Ph.D. Student
Université Catholique de Louvain
https://uclouvain.be/fr/repertoires/laura.caputo
-
Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4215
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Problem in parallelization
Yes, it seems correct at first sight.
If you want to be sure you have the same settings of the previous calculation, at the end of the output a mirror of the input file is reported.
Best,
Daniele
PS: Indeed there is some confusion in the description of the variables as BndsRnXp is mentioned instead of BndsRnXd.
The names for blocks and bands are the same, but the suffix is different s/d/p. static/dynamics/ppole
Best,
Daniele
If you want to be sure you have the same settings of the previous calculation, at the end of the output a mirror of the input file is reported.
Best,
Daniele
PS: Indeed there is some confusion in the description of the variables as BndsRnXp is mentioned instead of BndsRnXd.
The names for blocks and bands are the same, but the suffix is different s/d/p. static/dynamics/ppole
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/