Dear people of yambo
I get NaN when I perform ALDA with yambo on a simple molecule
here my input files
with the best regards
Javad
NaN in TDDFT calculation with yambo 4.2.1
Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano, Conor Hogan
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 10:23 pm
NaN in TDDFT calculation with yambo 4.2.1
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Javad Exirifard
IPM - Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences
P. O. Box 19395-5746
Niavaran Square
Tehran, Iran
IPM - Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences
P. O. Box 19395-5746
Niavaran Square
Tehran, Iran
- Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4209
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: NaN in TDDFT calculation with yambo 4.2.1
Dear Javad,
can you also add the report file of your calculation?
In any case my suggestion is to evaluate the TDDFT ALDA in configuration space more than in G space, as in G space you can have instability in the region of low density.
In order to do that you need to build the input as:
yambo -o b -k alda -y d
In this way you have also the advantage to include automatically all the G vectors in the kernel.
Best,
Daniele
can you also add the report file of your calculation?
In any case my suggestion is to evaluate the TDDFT ALDA in configuration space more than in G space, as in G space you can have instability in the region of low density.
In order to do that you need to build the input as:
yambo -o b -k alda -y d
In this way you have also the advantage to include automatically all the G vectors in the kernel.
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2015 6:32 am
Re: NaN in TDDFT calculation with yambo 4.2.1
Hi Daniele,
I am interested in:
Thanks
Jiuyu
I am interested in:
I notice you had said this kind of suggestion several times in the form. Why ALDA in G space is less stable? Can you refer me some references about this issue?Daniele Varsano wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 4:27 pm In any case my suggestion is to evaluate the TDDFT ALDA in configuration space more than in G space, as in G space you can have instability in the region of low density.
Thanks
Jiuyu
Jiuyu Sun
Department of Physics
University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Department of Physics
University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
- Daniele Varsano
- Posts: 4209
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: NaN in TDDFT calculation with yambo 4.2.1
Dear Jiuyu Sun,
for a long time now Yambo has been using the libxc libraries to evaluate the kernel, and therefore I would say that instabilities problem are no longer present. Main difference in the two approaches is that in G-space you include a number of kernel components equal to the block considered in the response function, while in transition space the kernel is evaluated in real space and all the components are automatically considered.
Best,
Daniele
for a long time now Yambo has been using the libxc libraries to evaluate the kernel, and therefore I would say that instabilities problem are no longer present. Main difference in the two approaches is that in G-space you include a number of kernel components equal to the block considered in the response function, while in transition space the kernel is evaluated in real space and all the components are automatically considered.
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/