Drude frequency in LRC

Deals with issues related to computation of optical spectra in reciprocal space: RPA, TDDFT, local field effects.

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano, Conor Hogan

Stephan
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:48 pm

Re: Drude frequency in LRC

Post by Stephan » Fri Dec 18, 2015 5:26 pm

Hi Daniele,
Have you already found out what went wrong in the LRC-calculations with the Drude contributuion?

Best regards
Stephan
Stephan Ludwig
1. phyical institute
University Stuttgart
Germany

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Drude frequency in LRC

Post by Daniele Varsano » Fri Dec 18, 2015 9:43 pm

Dear Stephan,
Unfortunately I did not have found the time to check it. In the meanwhile if you have time, can you do a calculation
including local-filed effects (hartree) with NGblk > 1, avoiding to use the LRC functional, including the Drude term and
post here the results?

Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Drude frequency in LRC

Post by Daniele Varsano » Wed Jan 13, 2016 12:48 pm

Dear Stephan,
we have been checking the Drude contribution which seems ok for RPA calculation, including local field effects.
The problem arise indeed when using the LRC functional, which seems to kill the zero frequency divergence.

Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

User avatar
Davide Sangalli
Posts: 640
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 4:49 pm
Location: Via Salaria Km 29.3, CP 10, 00016, Monterotondo Stazione, Italy
Contact:

Re: Drude frequency in LRC

Post by Davide Sangalli » Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:40 am

Dear Stephan,
few more comments.

As you may know the macroscopic part of the classical induced field is responsible for the difference between the epsilon, which in a metal has a divergence at w=0 and the eels, which has a pole at w=w_p. The alpha/q^2 kernel is exactly equal to such term if alpha=4\pi. Thus switching on alpha the kernel moves the divergence away from w=0 to w=w_p as one may expect.

Best,
Davide
Davide Sangalli, PhD
CNR-ISM, Division of Ultrafast Processes in Materials (FLASHit) and MaX Centre
https://sites.google.com/view/davidesangalli
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply