Absorption spectrum and exciton strengths

Deals with issues related to computation of optical spectra, solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation.

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
yunho.ahn
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2023 11:34 am

Absorption spectrum and exciton strengths

Post by yunho.ahn » Fri Jul 04, 2025 12:16 pm

Dear Yambo community,

I've been calculating the optical spectrum of an organic charge transfer complex materials using GW-BSE by following tutorials.
I wanted to overlay the exciton strengths onto the calculated absorption spectrum to present individual exciton contributions shape the absorption spectrum.

One thing that I'm confused is that, as far as I understand, the exciton strength is the linear combination of the square of the dipole transition matrix elements between electron-hole pairs and the imaginary part of the dielectric function is derived from them, shouldn't the exciton strength be equal to or less than the imaginary part of epsilon? even though it's normalized.

But I got the exciton strength, which is larger than the corresponding imaginary epsilon (especially the first one). Could you help me understand why this might be the case?

Thank you in advance for your insights.

Best,
Yunho
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Yunho Ahn (Ph.D)
Postdoc.
Photophysics and Photochemistry Lab. (https://myr.ewha.ac.kr/parklab/index.do)
Department of Chemistry and Nanoscience
EWHA WOMANS UNIVERSITY
Seoul, Korea

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4232
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Absorption spectrum and exciton strengths

Post by Daniele Varsano » Mon Jul 07, 2025 8:57 am

Dear Yunho,
One thing that I'm confused is that, as far as I understand, the exciton strength is the linear combination of the square of the dipole transition matrix elements between electron-hole pairs and the imaginary part of the dielectric function is derived from them
Correct! the dipoles are weighted with the corresponding BSE eigenvectors.
But I got the exciton strength, which is larger than the corresponding imaginary epsilon (especially the first one). Could you help me understand why this might be the case?
Please note the following:
1. The strength is the area beneath each peak of Im(eps) and not its height. The eps is obtained as convolution of Lorentzian function centered on each excitation, its intensity depends on the adopted smearing (broadening).

2. The strength in the output are normalized such that the largest value assumes the value 1. (The renormalization is reported in the exc file (Maximum Residual Value).

Best,

Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply