LongDrXs & BLongDir CUTBox

Deals with issues related to computation of optical spectra, solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation.

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
xjxiao
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:30 pm

LongDrXs & BLongDir CUTBox

Post by xjxiao » Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:10 am

Dear all,
What is the difference between the parameters LongDrXs (for calculating static screening in Yambo) and BLongDir (for BSE calculations)? How should they be set respectively? Do they need to be set the same?

For 2D materials, when using rim_cut in BSE calculations, what should the third component of CUTBox be set to?
CUTGeo= "box z" # [CUT] Coulomb Cutoff geometry: box/cylinder/sphere X/Y/Z/XY..
% CUTBox
0.00 | 0.00 | 32.0 | # [CUT] [au] Box sides
Thanks!
Xiao
Xiangjun Xiao
Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4207
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: LongDrXs & BLongDir CUTBox

Post by Daniele Varsano » Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:18 am

Dear Xiao,

LongDrXs: is the long wavelength limit direction for the static screening. A good choice is to average over the meaningful direction (1,1,1) for a bulk (1,1,0) for a 2D material.

BLongDrXs: it depends on which polarization you are interested in. If the system is not homogeneous you can be interested e.g. in 2D in the (100) and (010) separately.

For a 2D material it is recommended to use the shape "slab z" instead of the box which is somehow deprecated. Anyway, if you want to use it this is reported in the
FAQ: https://www.yambo-code.eu/learn/#FAQs

Best,

Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply