GW0 or G0W0 band gap

Concerns issues with computing quasiparticle corrections to the DFT eigenvalues - i.e., the self-energy within the GW approximation (-g n), or considering the Hartree-Fock exchange only (-x)

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
lyzhao
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 8:02 am

GW0 or G0W0 band gap

Post by lyzhao » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:34 am

Dear all,
I want to confirm whether Yambo produces GW0 or G0W0 band gap.
The file name 'r-gw_qp...' means gw0, but in this file, it shows

Code: Select all

[09.01] G0W0 (W PPA)
  ====================


gw_qp.in and r-gw_qp.. files are attached.

Best regards.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Youzhao Lan
College of Chemistry and Materials Science,
Zhejiang Normal University,
Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
HomePage: http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/lyzhao

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: GW0 or G0W0 band gap

Post by Daniele Varsano » Sat Feb 15, 2025 10:33 am

Dear Youzhao,

the input file you posted is a G0W0 calculation. The command-line -gw0 is meant for one shot gw.
If you are interested in eigenvalue self-consistency, you can have a look at this example:
https://wiki.yambo-code.eu/wiki/index.p ... alues_only

Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply