Unexpected Indirect Band Gap in Monolayer 2D MoSe₂ at G₀W₀ Level

Concerns issues with computing quasiparticle corrections to the DFT eigenvalues - i.e., the self-energy within the GW approximation (-g n), or considering the Hartree-Fock exchange only (-x)

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
TusharWaghmre
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2024 2:26 pm

Unexpected Indirect Band Gap in Monolayer 2D MoSe₂ at G₀W₀ Level

Post by TusharWaghmre » Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:22 am

Dear all,

I am calculating the G₀W₀ band structure for 2D MoSe₂, which, according to DFT, was anticipated to have a direct band gap at the K point. However, after completing the convergence calculations and applying the converged values for the essential parameters, I am observing an indirect band gap.

I have attached the relevant input and report files for your review. Any insights would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you!

Regards,
Tushar Waghmare.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Tushar Waghmare
Graduate M.Tech Student
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
IIT Kharagpur, India - 721302

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Unexpected Indirect Band Gap in Monolayer 2D MoSe₂ at G₀W₀ Level

Post by Daniele Varsano » Sun Feb 02, 2025 12:44 pm

Dear Tushar,
this is a known problem in TMD, possibly due to the used pesudopotential, or maybe not.
You can have a look at this paper, where the reason is assigned to the effect of the substrate.
https://link.aps.org/accepted/10.1103/P ... 103.125401

Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply