No issue in o.bands_interpolated

Anything regarding the post-processing utility (e.g. excitonic wavefunction analysis) is dealt with in this forum.

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
WEIW
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:48 am

No issue in o.bands_interpolated

Post by WEIW » Sun Feb 26, 2023 5:02 am

Dear developers,
When I interpolate band with GW correction after GW calculation, there are no issue in both o.bands_interpolated_up and o.bands_interpolated_dn.
In QE calculation,I set spin-polarized calculation without considering SOC.
the ypp_band.in is following:

Code: Select all

electrons                        # [R] Electronic properties
bnds                             # [R] Bands
INTERP_mode= "BOLTZ"                # Interpolation mode (NN=nearest point, BOLTZ=boltztrap aproach)
OutputAlat= 0.000000             # [a.u.] Lattice constant used for "alat" ouput format
cooIn= "rlu"                     # Points coordinates (in) cc/rlu/iku/alat
cooOut= "rlu"                    # Points coordinates (out) cc/rlu/iku/alat
% BANDS_bands
   21 | 25 |                         # Number of bands
%
INTERP_Shell_Fac= 20.00000       # The bigger it is a higher number of shells is used
GfnQPdb='E < ./allbz/ndb.QP'
INTERP_NofNN= 1                  # Number of Nearest sites in the NN method
CIRCUIT_E_DB_path= "none"        # SAVE obtained from the QE `bands` run (alternative to %BANDS_kpts)
BANDS_path= ""                   # High-Symmetry points labels (G,M,K,L...) also using composed positions (0.5xY+0.5xL).
BANDS_steps= 30                  # Number of divisions
#BANDS_built_in                # Print the bands of the generating points of the circuit using the nearest internal point
PROJECT_mode= "none"             # Instruct ypp how to project the DOS. ATOM, LINE, PLANE.
%BANDS_kpts                      # K points of the bands circuit
0 |0| 0 
0.333 |0.333 |0
0 |0.5 | 0
%
When I excute ypp, the output is following:

Code: Select all

 <---> [01] MPI/OPENMP structure, Files & I/O Directories
 <---> [02] Y(ambo) P(ost)/(re) P(rocessor)
 <---> [03] Core DB
 <---> :: Electrons             ::  45.00000
 <---> :: Temperature       [ev]::  0.000000
 <---> :: Lattice factors [a.u.]::   6.38867   5.53275  38.19067
 <---> :: K points              ::  12
 <---> :: Bands                 ::  200
 <---> :: Symmetries            ::  12
 <---> :: RL vectors            ::   421881
 <---> [04] K-point grid
 <---> :: Q-points   (IBZ)::  12
 <---> :: X K-points (IBZ)::  12
 <---> [05] CORE Variables Setup
 <---> [05.01] Unit cells
 <---> [05.02] Symmetries
 <---> [05.03] Reciprocal space
 <---> [05.04] K-grid lattice
 <---> Grid dimensions      :   9   9
 <---> [05.05] Energies & Occupations
 <---> [05.05.01] External/Internal QP corrections
 <---> E<./allbz/ndb.QP[ PPA@E  27.21138 = XG 753 = Xb 1-200 = Scb 1-200]
 <---> [dE_from_DB-Nearest K] Exact matches  [o/o]:  100.0000
 <---> [QP_apply] Action to be applied: E<./allbz/ndb.QP[ PPA@E  27.21138 = XG 753 = Xb 1-200 = Scb 1-200]
 <---> [05.05.01.01]  QP corrections report
 <---> [06] Interpolation tool
 <---> [06.01] Special Points for the HCP lattice
 <---> [06.02] Circuit analyzer/generator
 <---> Number of Q/K-points in the circuit ::   46
 <---> Circuit path         ::  G
 <---> [06.03] Interpolation@work: Circuit
 <---> [INTERPOLATION] Number of shells:  151
 <---> Interpolation@E_K_PATH (star) |########################################| [100%] --(E) --(X)
 <---> Interpolation@E_K_PATH (H fill) |########################################| [100%] --(E) --(X)
 <---> Interpolate@E_K_PATH Fourier |########################################| [100%] --(E) --(X)
 <---> [INTERPOLATION@E_K_PATH] Errors: Max, Avg, Avg_rel =   3.38628888E-06  4.14422459E-07  8.34004954E-03
 <---> Interpolate@E_K_PATH Fourier |########################################| [100%] --(E) --(X)
 <---> [06.04] Fermi Levels
 <---> Fermi Level  (BUILT-in bands) [eV]:  0.139841
 <---> [06.05] Bands output
 <---> Generating output for interpolated bands
 <---> [07] Timing Overview
 <---> [08] Memory Overview
 <---> [09] Game Over & Game summary
How do I solve this problem?
Dr. LIU Hongling
School of Physics, Shandong University
Jinan, CHINA

User avatar
Davide Sangalli
Posts: 614
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 4:49 pm
Location: Via Salaria Km 29.3, CP 10, 00016, Monterotondo Stazione, Italy
Contact:

Re: No issue in o.bands_interpolated

Post by Davide Sangalli » Sun Feb 26, 2023 5:14 pm

Dear LIU Hongling,
I do not understand which is the issue here.

Best,
D.

P.S.: the list of k-points in the input should be corrected as below
Not sure if this have any impact ...

Code: Select all

%BANDS_kpts                      # K points of the bands circuit
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
0.333 |0.333 | 0.0 |
0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
%
Davide Sangalli, PhD
CNR-ISM, Division of Ultrafast Processes in Materials (FLASHit) and MaX Centre
https://sites.google.com/view/davidesangalli
http://www.max-centre.eu/

WEIW
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:48 am

Re: No issue in o.bands_interpolated

Post by WEIW » Mon Feb 27, 2023 2:22 am

Dear developer,
Thanks for your quick reply. First, sorry about that I don't express my question clearly. then my question is that there is no data in o.bands_interpolated. And I also followed your suggestions but it doesn't work.
the output is attached.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Dr. LIU Hongling
School of Physics, Shandong University
Jinan, CHINA

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 3808
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: No issue in o.bands_interpolated

Post by Daniele Varsano » Mon Feb 27, 2023 9:03 am

Dear Liu,
can you also post the report file? r_electrons_bnds*

Best,

Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

WEIW
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:48 am

Re: No issue in o.bands_interpolated

Post by WEIW » Fri Mar 03, 2023 2:54 am

Dear developer,
I have attached the report file.

Best,

Liu
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Dr. LIU Hongling
School of Physics, Shandong University
Jinan, CHINA

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 3808
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: No issue in o.bands_interpolated

Post by Daniele Varsano » Sat Mar 04, 2023 11:32 am

Dear Liu,
actually I do not understand what's hapening here.
Can you try to remove this line from your input:
#OutputAlat= 0.000000

and reduce the number of bands, e.g. 20 | 26

and see if it works?

Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply