Exciton binding energy of Si

Concerns issues with computing quasiparticle corrections to the DFT eigenvalues - i.e., the self-energy within the GW approximation (-g n), or considering the Hartree-Fock exchange only (-x)

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
sdwang
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 12:30 pm

Exciton binding energy of Si

Post by sdwang » Sat May 29, 2010 6:50 am

Dear developers:
I have a question about the exciton binding energy of Si.The BSE absorption peak of bulk si is about 3.5eV for fisrt peak and 4.3 eV for the second,this value agree well with experiment.But its GW gap should less than 3.5eV (I have not calculated this, the experiment value is about 1.2eV , I think the GW value should about 1.2eV more or less), and the exciton binding energy=GW gap-BSE peak,so, the exciton binding of bulk Si is negative?? Is my opinion wrong??

Thanks!
S. D. Wang
IMU,HOHHOT,CHINA
E-mail: sdwang@imu.edu.cn

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 3838
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Exciton binding energy of Si

Post by Daniele Varsano » Sat May 29, 2010 12:08 pm

Yes, the values your are supposing to be the GW gap is wrong.
If you don't want to calculate it, just check some literature:

M.S. Hybertsen and S. Louie, PRL 55, 1418 (1985)
M.S. Hybertsen and S. Louie, PRB 34, 5390 (1986)
R.W. Godby, M. Schlueter, L.J. Sham, PRB 37, 10159 (1988)

The Silicon gap, at LDA level, is the double of what you are supposing to be.

Cheers,
Daniele

PS: in case excitation peaks are higher in energy than photoemission gap, the excitation is not bound!
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

User avatar
myrta gruning
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:38 am
Contact:

Re: Exciton binding energy of Si

Post by myrta gruning » Sat May 29, 2010 2:50 pm

Dear Shudong,

The minimal gap in Si is indeed about 1.2 eV, as you mentioned. However it is indirect :?:
Optical transitions do not "connect" different k-points. So you have to compare with the direct gap of Si, that I believe is above 3 eV.

Regards,
m
Dr Myrta Grüning
School of Mathematics and Physics
Queen's University Belfast - Northern Ireland

http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-1515-2009

Post Reply