QP gap of black phosphorus

Concerns issues with computing quasiparticle corrections to the DFT eigenvalues - i.e., the self-energy within the GW approximation (-g n), or considering the Hartree-Fock exchange only (-x)

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea.ferretti, myrta gruning, andrea marini, Daniele Varsano

Post Reply
burkzdemir
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:57 pm

QP gap of black phosphorus

Post by burkzdemir » Mon Jul 26, 2021 7:50 pm

Dear developers,

I am trying to calculate G0W0 gap of black phosphorus. I converged the result with respect to total number of bands (200), response block size (450 RL), and I used 4 valance and 5 conduction bands. However, I find 0.74 eV with G0W0 (PBE value is 0.17 eV) and in the literature, G0W0 gap is found to be 0.3 eV. Experimental value is 0.33 eV. Why am I finding so large gap? Am I missing something in the calculations?
Burak Ozdemir
Post-doc,
University of Nantes, France

User avatar
Daniele Varsano
Posts: 3808
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: QP gap of black phosphorus

Post by Daniele Varsano » Tue Jul 27, 2021 8:46 am

Dear Burak,
probably you are doing nothing wrong BP is rather complex as the gap is very sensible to the considered structure, in particular the interlayer distance.
From the number you are obtaining it seems like you are not considering vdW interaction in the structure and it turns out the system has a rather large gap.
Note that when considering relaxed structure using vdw interaction you obtain an interlayer distance which is in agreement with experiments but the PBE band structure has a very small band gap, or even metallic behaviour. GW on top of this band structure provides results in agreement with experiment, but for my experience only if you consider some eigenvalue sellf-consistency. There are in literature calculation reporting a band gap in agreement in the literature at G0W0 level, but we were not able to reproduce and this is most probably due to the different plasmon pole model used in the calculation (Tran et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 89, 235319 (2014)).

You can find some info in: Ridenko et al Phys. Rev. B 92, 085419 (2015) and reference therein.

Best,

Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/

Post Reply